跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03256591
NCT03256591Unknown不适用

A Comparison of the Implementation of HBB Training Using Facilitators With and Without Simulation Methodology Training

Mbarara University of Science and Technology2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2017年10月30日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
100
试验地点
2
主要终点
Knowledge

研究概览

简要总结

Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) implementation is associated with reduction in neonatal deaths and reduction in fresh stillbirths. HBB has successfully integrated some aspects of simulation into an educational curriculum that teach the management of neonatal emergencies in resource-constrained countries.

Simulation based training brings special advantages and may enhance HBB training. Critical elements of simulation such as enhanced realism and post-event debriefing may carry potential to strengthen HBB training to attain maximum impact. However, evidence for the effectiveness of this combined approach is limited.

详细描述

Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) implementation is associated with reduction in neonatal deaths and reduction in fresh stillbirths. HBB has successfully integrated some aspects of simulation into an educational curriculum that teach the management of neonatal emergencies in resource-constrained countries.

High levels of physical, emotional and conceptual realism are important features of simulation-based learning that impact learning outcomes. Formal debriefing is characterized as the most important element of simulation based education. Structured feedback in a safe learning environment provides the opportunity for learning of clinically relevant material. Guided reflection transfers the responsibility for learning to the participants and solidifies knowledge, skills and behaviors for transfer to clinical practice.

Simulation based training brings special advantages and may enhance HBB training. Critical elements of simulation such as enhanced realism and post-event debriefing may carry potential to strengthen HBB training to attain maximum impact. However, evidence for the effectiveness of this combined approach is limited.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

盲法说明

No masking will be done

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Only trained facilitators are eligible to participate
  • Must hold a Faculty position or are a health care provider at KIU Teaching Hospital in western Uganda
  • Are engaged in teaching health students.
  • Participating medical students are those enrolled at KIU Teaching Hospital in western Uganda

排除标准

  • Faculty and hospital workers who are not engaged in teaching health students.
  • Medical students not enrolled at KIU Teaching Hospital, western Uganda

研究组 & 干预措施

HBB plus simulation training

Experimental

Participants receive training from facilitators for HBB training with simulation skills

干预措施: HBB facilitators with simulation training (Other)

Control

No Intervention

Participants receive training from facilitators for HBB training without simulation skills

结局指标

主要结局

Knowledge

时间窗: Change in knowledge scores at 6 months from Baseline

The primary outcome for this analysis is level of knowledge. For each course, learners will be assessed at baseline and at course-end to determine their knowledge via multiple choice test. Scores out of 100% will be computed

次要结局

  • Clinical skills(Change in clinical skills at 6 months from baseline)
  • Facilitator debriefing skills(Change in facilitator skills at 6 months from baseline)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验