跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05814328
NCT05814328招募中不适用

Geriatric Transitional Care for Older Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department: Impact on Early Readmissions

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,322 人开始时间: 2025年3月4日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
1,322
试验地点
2
主要终点
Revisits to an emergency Department

研究概览

简要总结

Elderly adults have high rates of emergency department (ED) visits. Specificities of this population challenge organizations of care in the ED, and older adults are at risk of pejorative outcomes after an ED stay. Numerous interventions have been designed to improve quality of care and outcomes for the older population in these settings, with a specific attention to concerning discharge from the ED. These interventions are interdisciplinary, bridging emergency and geriatric care. The wide range and complexity of these interventions make them difficult to assess and compare, as highlighted by several reviews in the past ten years. Prior analyses helped to categorize different intervention strategies and three main designs: inhospital, community and transitional interventions started in the ED and pursued in collaboration with community primary care professionals . Theses analyses show that the use of multiple strategies and transitional models of care tend to lead to better outcomes, and underline that more robust studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. In France a majority of EDs collaborate with Geriatric Mobile Teams (GMT) to improve quality of care for older patients. GMTs are dedicated to patients over 75 years old, and interventions in EDs are targeted on patients at risk of worse outcome. When ED physicians detect older patients at risk they may call for the GMT for further assessment and management. GMTs either work in a inhospital standard approach or with a transitional care management. This second strategy, less common in France, is thought to be be efficient and has never been assessed. We have designed a study to compare these methods, with the hypothesis that among at-risk older adults, hospital-community transition care initiated by GMTs during an ED visit with direct discharge home will be associated with a reduction in the risk of early readmission within 30 days, and lower risk of loss of independence at 3 and 6 months. It is a french multicentric study, with a quasi-experimental design, comparing hospitals without transitional care management to hospitals with hospital-community transitional intervention. We aim at enrolling 1322 patients aged 75 and more at risk of pejorative outcomes as determined by the Triage Risk Screening Toll (TRST). The main outcome is a revisit to the ED between day 7 and day 30, secondary outcomes are autonomy, mortality, use of hospital services and caregiving at home at 6 months.

详细描述

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of transitional care initiated by Mobile Geriatrics Team (MGTs) at the time of the ED visit on the incidence of early readmissions, on medical journey and autonomy within 6 months after the ED visit, for adults aged 75 or older and considered at risk for early readmission. This is a multicenter, prospective, controlled, non-randomized quasi-experimental study. Inclusion criteria are age 75 years and more, returning home after an ED visit, with a Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST) score ≥ 2. Exclusion criteria are living in nursing home, being under legal guardianship or incapacity to consent. All participants will provide a written consent after receiving oral and written information. Participants with language barrier, severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders may be included provided that a relative is physically present at the time of the ED visit. Otherwise they will not be included. The study protocol has been submitted for approval to the ethic committee. Five centers (two university hospitals, three regional hospitals) work on an in-hospital strategy and do not perform transitional care. After identifying the patient at risk, the in-hospital MGT solely provides usual recommendations at the time of the ED visit, without offering home-based intervention or coordination with community actors. The participants included in these centers will form the control group.

Seven centers (three university hospitals, four regional hospitals) work on an transitional care method. These centers have an in and out-hospital MGT that carry out geriatric assessment, offer home-visits if necessary, and have a hospital-community coordination for the management of older patients. This coordination is defined by either regular joint clinical meetings, joint visits, shared professionals, or a shared information system. After identification of the at-risk patient, the first step in management consists in a telephone call by the GMT to the patient or his family and primary care professionals within six days of his return home. Depending on the geriatric assessment performed and the coordination organization specific to each center, multidisciplinary interventions can then be proposed and deployed. The patients included in these centers will form the intervention group.

All 12 centers (intervention and control) meet the following criteria for a standardized in-hospital management during the ED visit, including (i) identification of patients at risk based on clinical characteristics or identification scores with a procedure for reporting to the in-hospital GMT; (ii) a multidisciplinary GMT mobilized in the ED for patients at risk providing a standardized geriatric assessment; (iii) a discharge procedure with at least a medical report and referral to the general practitioner.

The principal investigator and the scientific committee will regularly verify that centers continue to meet the conditions of the group it is allocated.

After inclusion, the participants will benefit from the usual care specific to the inclusion center where they were recruited. In the intervention group, GMT intervention initiation consists in an early, standardized telephone call between D1 and D6 for each participant. To respect a pragmatic approach, the intervention of the MGT and the out-of-hospital management strategy are deliberately not standardized in order to evaluate the hospital-community coordination fitting each territory .

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
75 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient admitted to the emergency departement over 75 years old and living at home (including independent residence)
  • Patient admitted to the Emergency Reception Service (ERS) for less than 48 hours for whom a return home has been decided
  • Identified at risk of readmissions to the emergency departement with a Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST) score >
  • Consent to the study possible at the time of his visit to the emergency room by the patient or a caregiver present at the time of inclusion.
  • Patient affiliated with a social security (beneficiary or partner)

排除标准

  • Person living in an nursing home
  • Severe cognitive impairment according to DSM V criteria and absence of a close relative at the time of inclusion
  • Unstabilized psychiatric pathology and absence of relatives at the time of inclusion
  • Language barrier and absence of relatives at the time of inclusion
  • Person under guardianship, under legal safeguard measure, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons subject to psychiatric care without their consent, persons admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than those of the research
  • Patient under state medical assistance
  • Patient already included in the research

结局指标

主要结局

Revisits to an emergency Department

时间窗: From Day 7 to day 30

次要结局

  • Cumulated time of hospitalization(day 7 to 6 months)
  • Inhospital consultations(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Number of patients with medical follow-up(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Delay to the first revisit to an ED(day 7 to 6 months)
  • Independence evolution(Day 0 to 3 months)
  • Informal caregiver evolution(Day 0 to 6 months)
  • Healthcare provider evolution(Day 0 to 6 months)
  • Personal care assistant evolution(Day 0 to 6 months)
  • Living in a nursing home(at 3 months and 6 months)
  • Living at home(at 3 months and 6 months)
  • Hospitalization(at 3 months and 6 months)
  • Number of ED visits(from day 7 to 6 months)
  • Number of primary care medical visits(from day 7 to 6 months)
  • Day hospital(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Scheduled hospitalizations in short-term care,follow-up and rehabilitation care(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Nature of scheduled hospitalizations in short-term care,follow-up and rehabilitation care(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Nature of unscheduled hospitalizations in short-term care, follow-up and rehabilitation care(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Number of patient with autonomy, care or social assistance,(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • GMT home visits(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Delay from ED to first GMT assessment(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Vital status(at 3 months and 6 months)
  • Unscheduled hospitalisation in short-term care, follow-up and rehabilitation care(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Number of patient with personalized health plan(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Contacts with patient and informal caregiver(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Contacts with primary healthcare providers(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Multidisciplinary GMT- community team meetings(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Cumulative time of follow up(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Cumulative GMT interventions(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Patient refusal(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • Lost to follow up(from day 0 to 6 months)
  • description of the socio-demographic characteristics of the patients(day 0)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验