跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06074159
NCT06074159已完成不适用

Expanding Effective Report-back of Environmental Exposures in Clinic-Based Studies

Silent Spring Institute4 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 163 人开始时间: 2023年8月25日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
163
试验地点
4
主要终点
Environmental health literacy as measured by pre-and post-tests (questionnaires).

研究概览

简要总结

The study trains clinicians to return personal exposure results to study participants in pregnancy cohorts, and measures outcomes for environmental health literacy for both clinicians and study participants.

详细描述

To design and implement clinic-based report-back for endocrine disrupting compounds and analyze the impacts of doing so, investigators train clinicians to report-back individual chemical results to study participants in two pregnancy cohorts and then evaluate outcomes for both clinicians and patients, including shifts in environmental health behaviors, using interviews and pre-and post-tests. All study participants will get a personal exposure report and 200 participants from each cohort (N Total= 400) are randomly selected and assigned equally to one of two groups: 1) those who only receive their personal results online and 2)those who receive them in-clinic to measure additional benefits of clinical report-back for participant learning, exposure-related behaviors, and relationships to the study and clinical care.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 55 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Participants are of reproductive age

排除标准

  • Under 18 years old or past reproductive age

研究组 & 干预措施

In-clinic report-back

Other

200 participants receive their personal exposure results from a clinician

干预措施: In-clinic report-back (Behavioral)

Online

Other

200 participants receive their personal exposure results from a website online

干预措施: In-clinic report-back (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Environmental health literacy as measured by pre-and post-tests (questionnaires).

时间窗: 2 weeks

2 weeks after completing a pre-test and receiving their personal results, study participants will take a post-test. Pre-and post-tests include true and false, as well as scale questions that measure shifts in environmental health literacy before and after report-back.

Knowledge Before and After Report-back Intervention.

时间窗: Participants completed pre and post-surveys before and at least 2 weeks after report-back up to a maximum of 6 weeks.

Participants were asked to respond to a series of 9-11 statements about environmental exposures and select if they were true, probably true, probably false, or false. Responses were re-coded to indicate correctness, and index score was calculated as the fraction of correct responses across all questions for each participant (0-1). Pre-survey knowledge indices were subtracted from post-survey indices to calculate the change after report-back (i.e., pre-post-survey change in knowledge is reported below). A larger reported mean below would indicate that report-back mode resulted in a larger knowledge gain (a better outcome).

Satisfaction With Report-back After Report-back Intervention

时间窗: Participants completed post-surveys at least 2 weeks after report-back up to a maximum of 6 weeks.

Participants were asked to rank their agreement with four satisfaction questions at the post-survey using a Likert-scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Responses to all four questions were summed to calculate post-report-back sum satisfaction from 4-20. A higher score indicates more satisfaction (a better outcome).

Feelings About Report-back, Before and After Intervention

时间窗: Participants completed pre and post-surveys before and at least 2 weeks after report-back up to a maximum of 6 weeks.

Participants ranked the strength of each feeling using a Likert-scale from 1 (not at all) to 6 (very strong). Pre-survey responses were subtracted from post-survey responses to calculate the change after report-back. A higher score for outcomes measures such as empowered and respected indicates a better outcome.

Perceived Self-efficacy Before and After Report-back Intervention

时间窗: Participants completed pre and post-surveys before and at least 2 weeks after report-back up to a maximum of 6 weeks.

Participants were asked to respond to a series of seven statements and rate confidence in their abilities using a Likert-scale from 0 (cannot do it at all) to 6 (highly certain I can do it). Responses to all seven questions were summed to calculate a perceived self-efficacy scale from 0-42. Pre-survey scales were subtracted from post-survey scales to calculate the change after report-back. A higher scores indicates a better outcome.

Behaviors Before and After Report-back Intervention

时间窗: Participants completed pre and post-surveys before and at least 2 weeks after report-back up to a maximum of six weeks.

Participants were asked to rate how frequently they engaged in exposure-related behaviors during the previous two weeks using a Likert-scale from 0 (never) to 3 (Always/almost every day). Pre-survey responses were subtracted from post-survey responses to calculate the change after report-back. A higher score indicates a better outcome for questions such as 'look for information about chemical ingredients', whereas a lower score indicates a better outcome for questions such as 'microwave food in plastic containers.'

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Silent Spring Institute
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验