跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02915991
NCT02915991终止不适用

Prospective, Single Arm, Open Label, User Evaluation Sudy of SyncVision System With Software v4.X

Volcano Corporation2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 35 人开始时间: 2016年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
35
试验地点
2
主要终点
Professional user feedback regarding clinical utility of the SyncVision 4.X system

研究概览

简要总结

This is a prospective, single-arm, unblinded, case observation study evaluating a commercially released 'Conformité Européenne' (CE)-mark co-registration software system along-side of a commercially- released CE-mark coronary physiology and X-ray system during routine clinical workflow. The purpose of this study is to collect Professional user feedback regarding clinical utility of the SyncVision 4.X system.

详细描述

The PREPARE II study will enroll a maximum of 200 patients in up to 5 sites. No follow-up will be performed. The PREPARE II study will only collect data during diagnostic angiogram or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure, when performed as per standard hospital care.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients eligible and indicated for cardiac catheterization and pressure-wire assessment in the coronary arteries as per standard hospital practice
  • Males over the age of 18 years and post-menopausal females
  • Patient is able to give written informed consent prior to using his/her study data for evaluation and documentation

排除标准

  • Patient is unable to give written informed consent prior to using his/her study data for evaluation and documentation

结局指标

主要结局

Professional user feedback regarding clinical utility of the SyncVision 4.X system

时间窗: Day 1 (Post-Procedure)

After the procedure the physician will be asked to rate and comment on the clinical utility and features of the SyncVision 4.X system in the post-study user evaluation questionnaire. This will include questions on the potential of the system to facilitate clinical decision-making, utility of co-registration workflow and functionality, quality of the co-registration and user interface functions.

次要结局

  • Difference between assessments(Day 1 (Post-Procedure))
  • Distinguish tandem, diffuse and mixed disease(Day 1 (Post-Procedure))
  • Comparison of pre-intervention expected distal-most iFR with post-intervention actual distal-most iFR values(Day 1 (Post-Procedure))

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验