跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01730794
NCT01730794已完成不适用

A Comparative, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study of Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) vs. Conventional Lung Protective Ventilation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure

Massachusetts General Hospital14 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 306 人开始时间: 2014年3月28日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
306
试验地点
14
主要终点
Number of invasive ventilator free days.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare a specific mode of artificial ventilation (help from a breathing machine) with other modes. This specific mode is called Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and is different from other modes as it uses direct signals from the diaphragm (breathing muscle) to help patients breathe. The investigators believe that using these signals, NAVA can determine the exact timing for patients' spontaneous breathing effort and delivers the artificial breath at the same time (in synchrony) with their own breath. Other modes (breathing methods) may cause asynchrony between the patient and the ventilator while delivering artificial breaths because of the way they operate. Asyncrony between patient and ventilator is a risk factor for increasing the length of artificial ventilation and number of related complications. The investigators would like to find out if NAVA performs better in establishing synchrony between patient and ventilator and as a result decreasing time for artificial ventilation and increasing better outcomes.

详细描述

Study Goal To compare the ability of NAVA vs. conventional lung protective ventilation in a multicenter, unblinded, randomized, controlled fashion to provide invasive ventilatory support during acute respiratory failure in adults who are expected to require ventilatory support for greater than 72 hours.

Hypothesis It is hypothesized that the use of NAVA compared to conventional lung protective ventilation will result in a decrease in the number of days of mechanical ventilation. It is further hypothesized that NAVA compared to conventional lung protective ventilation will result in a decrease in the length of weaning, the length of ICU and hospital stay, and mortality.

Primary Outcome

• Number of invasive ventilator free days.

Secondary Outcome

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Age greater than or equal to 18 years
  • •Hypoxemic or hypercapnic acute respiratory failure
  • •Intubation and mechanical ventilation
  • •Anticipated mechanical ventilation equal or longer than 72 hrs
  • •Mechanically ventilated less or equal to 5 days
  • •Able to spontaneously trigger the ventilator

排除标准

  • •moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • •Post-operative patient's normally requiring a short course of mechanical ventilation (for example most cardiac surgical patients)
  • •Unable to spontaneously breathe
  • •Need to provide controlled ventilation
  • •Poor short term prognosis (defined as a high risk of death in the next 3 months)
  • •Neuromuscular or neurologic disease
  • •Age < 18 years
  • •Patients with major esophageal, gastric and oral surgery
  • •Acute brain injury or elevated intracranial pressure (> 18 mmHg)
  • •Severe cardiac disease: New York Heart Association class 3 or 4 or acute coronary syndrome or persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
  • •Pregnancy, must be confirmed by laboratory analysis.

研究组 & 干预措施

Conventional Lung Protective Ventilation

Other

In this group, patients will be ventilated in either volume A/C, pressure A/C, pressure support, pressure regulated volume control or volume support based on the discretion of the medical team with TV 4-8 ml/kg PBW range and PP or pressure (control or support) level <30 cmH2O.

干预措施: Conventional Lung Protective Ventilation (Other)

NAVA Ventilation Group

Other

In the NAVA group, NAVA level will be set initially at zero, then the maximum Edi will be determined as the average level over the next 3 to 5 breaths without ventilatory support or PEEP. The actual NAVA level will then be titrated by the clinician to achieve the following: 1) an Edi equal to approximately 50% of the maximum Edi, 2) an average tidal volume of between 4 to 8 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW), and 3) an average respiratory rate between about 15 and 40 per minute. In addition, the trigger sensitivity should be set as sensitive as possible without causing auto-triggering and the maximum pressure limit in NAVA should be set at 40 cm H2O.

干预措施: NAVA ventilation (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Number of invasive ventilator free days.

时间窗: 28 days

Number of days without mechanical ventilation, within the first 28 days of the study.

次要结局

  • Ventilator associated pneumonia(60 Days)
  • Length of ICU stay(90 Days)
  • ICU and hospital Mortality(90 days)
  • Incidence of barotrauma(60 Days)
  • Development of Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)(60 Days)
  • Total length of mechanical ventilation in survivors (invasive plus noninvasive)(90 days)
  • Length of hospital stay(90 Days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Robert M. Kacmarek

Professor of Anesthesia, Director of Respiratory Care Services

Massachusetts General Hospital

研究点 (14)

Loading locations...

相似试验