Narrow Band Imaging Versus Artificial Intelligence for Colonic Surveillance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study The CLEAR-IBD Trial (Colorectal Lesion Evaluation Assisted by Real-time AI in Inflammatory Bowel Disease)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Neoplasia miss rate (NMR) assessed in a per-lesion analysis
研究概览
简要总结
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) - ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease - have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer than the general population. For this reason, regular colonoscopies are recommended to look for early warning signs, such as abnormal areas of tissue called dysplasia, which can develop into cancer over time.
Finding these abnormal areas during colonoscopy can be difficult because IBD causes ongoing inflammation that can make the bowel mucosa look irregular, hiding subtle changes. Doctors currently use a technique called narrow-band imaging (NBI), a special light setting on the colonoscope that enhances the visibility of the bowel, to help spot these areas more easily.
A newer tool, artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted detection, has shown promise in helping doctors find more polyps during routine colonoscopies in the general population. However, this AI tool was developed and tested mostly in people without IBD, so it is not yet known whether it works as well in people with IBD, whose bowel can look very different due to chronic inflammation.
This study will directly compare the AI tool (CADe; ENDO-AID, Olympus) with narrow-band imaging to see which one is better at finding abnormal areas during colonoscopy in patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease who are having their routine cancer surveillance exam.
Each participant will have one colonoscopy in which the bowel is examined twice in a row, once with each technique, by two different doctors, in random order. This lets researchers compare both methods directly within the same patient, which is the fairest comparison.
The study aims to enroll 60 patients at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Researchers hope the results will help determine whether AI tools - which are widely available and easier to use than NBI - can be a reliable alternative for IBD surveillance, potentially making this important cancer-screening exam more accessible in the future.
详细描述
Background and Rationale
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with the general population, and colonoscopic surveillance has been shown to reduce both CRC incidence and CRC-related mortality. Although high-definition dye-based chromoendoscopy is recommended by most guidelines as the surveillance technique of choice, its uptake remains limited due to training requirements, added procedure time, and cost. As a result, several guidelines continue to accept virtual chromoendoscopy techniques, including narrow-band imaging (NBI), and high-definition white-light endoscopy as alternatives.
Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems based on artificial intelligence have demonstrated meaningful improvements in adenoma and polyp detection in non-IBD populations. However, the convolutional neural network-based algorithms underlying these systems have largely been trained on datasets that excluded patients with IBD, so the real-world performance of currently available non-IBD-trained CADe systems for detecting colitis-associated dysplasia remains unknown. Existing evidence in this area has relied mainly on retrospective analyses of still-image datasets, without prospective, real-time comparison against validated comparators such as chromoendoscopy or NBI. A direct, prospective comparison is therefore needed.
Study Design This is a unicentric, two-arm, open-label, randomized, crossover clinical trial conducted at the IBD Clinic of the Gastroenterology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain. Each participant undergoes a single colonoscopy in which the entire colon is examined twice, consecutively, by two different endoscopists using the two study techniques (CADe and NBI) in randomized order, allowing each patient to act as their own control and minimizing between-patient confounding.
Study Procedures Each participant is examined on the same day by two endoscopists with expertise in IBD endoscopic surveillance. Endoscopist 1 examines the entire colon using either AI (ENDO-AID CADe System, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) or NBI, per the randomization sequence. Before lesion assessment, endoscopic remission is confirmed using the Mayo endoscopic score (UC) or the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD), requiring a score of 0. Lesions identified are documented and managed accordingly (resection or biopsy). Endoscopist 2, blinded to the findings of Endoscopist 1, re-examines the entire colon using the alternate technique, documents any additional findings, and manages any lesions missed during the first examination. Both endoscopists perform an equal number of examinations with each technique as the first or second pass, and all procedures use the same high-definition endoscope and processor (Olympus CF-HQ190L, EVIS X1).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Screening
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients with IBD, scheduled for endoscopic colorectal cancer surveillance following the ECCO guidelines.
- •≥ 18 years-old.
- •At least 8 year duration ulcerative colitis (UC) or colonic Crohn's disease (CD) unless in case of concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis which any disease duration was eligible for screening colonoscopy.
排除标准
- •Inadequate bowel preparation (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale < 6).
- •The presence of any degree of endoscopic inflammation or technical reasons that prevented completion of colonoscopy, such as a critical stenosis.
研究组 & 干预措施
NBI first followed by AI
Patients were consecutively allocated in a 1:1 alternating sequence to either the "NBI first followed by AI" arm or the "AI first followed by NBI" arm. Allocation was performed prior to the procedure by endoscopist 1. Blinding was not feasible owing to the nature of the intervention.
干预措施: ENDO-AID CADe System (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) (AI device) (Device)
AI first followed by NBI
Patients were consecutively allocated in a 1:1 alternating sequence to either the "NBI first followed by AI" arm or the "AI first followed by NBI" arm. Allocation was performed prior to the procedure by endoscopist 1. Blinding was not feasible owing to the nature of the intervention.
干预措施: ENDO-AID CADe System (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) (AI device) (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
Neoplasia miss rate (NMR) assessed in a per-lesion analysis
时间窗: Periprocedural.
Calculated as the number of neoplastic lesions missed during the first examination and detected on the second examination, divided by the total number of neoplastic lesions detected across both examinations.
次要结局
- Neoplasia miss rate (NMR) evaluated in a per-patient analysis(Periprocedural.)
- Withdrawal time(Periprocedural.)
- Degree of histological inflammatory activity(Periprocedural.)
- Rate of colorectal neoplasia detection(Periprocedural.)
- Size of detected neoplastic lesions, by detection technique(Periprocedural.)
- Morphological classification of detected neoplastic lesions, by detection technique(Periprocedural.)
- Histological classification of detected neoplastic lesions, by detection technique(Periprocedural.)
