"Impact of an Educational Podcast for Patients With Chronic Pelvic Pain"
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Social Support Subset of Endometriosis Health Profile 30
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this research study is to study the impact of an educational podcast on pelvic pain. If you decide to take part in this research, you may receive the standard treatment for pelvic pain, or you may receive the standard treatment plus access to an educational podcast series. You will be randomly assigned to receive access to the podcast or to receive standard care. If you are assigned to receive access to the podcast, participating in this research will involve listening to a podcast series. All participants will complete three ten-minute online surveys over the course of 6 months. Reasons you may choose to participate in this research are if you want to learn more about pelvic pain and possible benefits of listening to the podcast, such as improved quality of life, reduced stigma, or increased satisfaction with your medical care.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Being seen as a new patient or consult visit by provider in the division of minimally invasive gynecology surgery for chronic pelvic pain or endometriosis
- •18 years of age or older
- •Understand English
- •Has an email address and personal device with capability to listen to an audio podcast
排除标准
- •Not able to speak English
- •Being seen for acute pelvic pain
研究组 & 干预措施
Podcast
Podcast Series - 12 episodes on topics related to chronic pelvic pain
干预措施: Podcast (Behavioral)
Standard Care
Standard care for pelvic pain, no access to podcast
结局指标
主要结局
Social Support Subset of Endometriosis Health Profile 30
时间窗: 6 months
Pelvic Pain Impact Questionnaire
时间窗: 6 months
Score range: Typically transformed to 0-100 Interpretation: * Higher scores = worse social functioning / poorer quality of life * Lower scores = better outcomes
Loneliness and Social Isolation, DeJong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
时间窗: 6 months
Score range: 0-6 Interpretation: * Higher scores = greater loneliness * Lower scores = less loneliness
Chronic Illness Anticipated Stigma Scale
时间窗: 6 months
Score range: 12-60 Interpretation: * Higher scores = greater anticipated stigma * Lower scores = less perceived stigma
Patient Satisfaction CSQ4 Questionnaire
时间窗: 6 months
Score range: 4-16 Interpretation: * Higher scores = greater satisfaction * Lower scores = lower satisfaction
次要结局
- Experience with Podcast(6 months)
研究者
Lara Harvey
Associate Professor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center