Vitrectomy Machine Versus Spring Loaded Syringe for Active Silicon Oil Extraxtion
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 200
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Incidence of complications
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of our study is to compare between two techniques used for active SOR. The outcomes include efficiency and safety.
Patients with silicon filled eyes and prepared for SOR 540 eyes of 505 patients (one eye in 470 patients, and both eyes in 35 patients) were enrolled in the study.
All eyes underwent SOR using 23-Gauge PPV. The eyes were classified according to the surgical technique used for SOR into two groups:- Group A: SOR was performed using SO extraction program built in Optikon vitrectomy device Group B: SOR was performed using modified spring loaded syringe.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients subjected previously to pars plana vitrectomy with silicon oil tamponade.
排除标准
- •Recurrent retinal detachment
- •Previous scleral buckling
- •Previous glaucoma surgery
- •Bleeding tendencies
- •Anterior staphyloma
研究组 & 干预措施
Group A
Conventional technique using vitrectomy machine
干预措施: Vitrectomy machine (Device)
Group B
Spring loaded syringe for silicon oil extraction
干预措施: Spring loaded syringe (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
Incidence of complications
时间窗: During the surgical procedure and up to 3 months postoperative
Incidence of operative and postoperative complications in both groups
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Alaa Abdalsadek Ahmed Sinjab
Lecturer of Ophthalmology
Sohag University