跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02266732
NCT02266732已完成不适用

Ultrasound Vs Nerve Stimulation - Why is a PNS so Effective?

The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust0 个研究点目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2011年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
20
主要终点
Nerve stimulation resulting in muscle contraction or not

研究概览

简要总结

The traditional model of localizing a nerve for blockade is using a peripheral nerve stimulator, PNS. Recent advances in UltraSound technology has allowed UltraSound to guide nerve blockade. However despite excellent visualization nerve block success has not significantly improved. I aim to show that this is because the PNS stimulation of a nerve is more than a proximity response as thought but a correct fascial plane response and hence the high success rate of this blind approach.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • ASA 1 to 3 patients for any shoulder surgery or unilateral ACL knee surgery

排除标准

  • Refusal to consent
  • Allergy to Chirocaine local anaesthetic
  • Pace maker in situ
  • Sepsis at site of regional block

结局指标

主要结局

Nerve stimulation resulting in muscle contraction or not

时间窗: Five minutes

Whether the nerve is successfully stimulated, resulting in muscle contraction, or not when the needle is on the wrong side of the fascial layer.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验