跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04940156
NCT04940156终止不适用

Comparison of the Performance of Implantable Cardiac Monitors and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Detecting Atrial Fibrillation

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 6 人开始时间: 2021年10月4日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
6
试验地点
1
主要终点
Assessment of Performance of Confirm Rx ICM and Reveal LINQ ICM in Detecting AF Episodes in Comparison to CIED

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this project is to study the performance of the two most commonly used Implantable Cardiac Monitors in detecting AF episodes and explore how the new connectivity can empower patients and improve patient care.

详细描述

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common abnormal heart rhythm disturbance, affecting 1-2 million people in the UK. The irregular heartbeat caused by AF can make the heart pump blood less efficiently. As a result, AF significantly increases the risk of having a stroke, heart failure and dementia. However, a significantly proportion of people have no symptoms, and they may be only found to be in AF after having a stroke. Therefore, diagnosis largely relies on accurate electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring.

AF episodes can be unpredictable and easily missed unless continuous ECG monitoring is undertaken. Pacemakers can continuously record the heart's electrical activity and detect AF with a high degree of confidence. However, they are invasive and rely on electrical wires implanted inside the heart, and hence less suited to be used as primary monitoring devices. To overcome these difficulties, implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) have been designed to be placed under the skin.

The new generation of ICMs can now be injected under the skin. Moreover, they connect with the patient's smartphone and transmit recordings. Despite these significant improvements, their ability to reliably capture AF has never been tested against pacemakers.

The aim of this project is to study the performance of the two commonly used ICMs in detecting AF episodes and explore how the new connectivity can empower patients and improve patient care. The investigators plan to inject an ICM in 30 patients with AF and pre-existing pacemaker. After a period of 6 months, the investigators will compare how many episodes were detected in each device. With the information collected the investigators will try to understand the pitfalls in the current technology and develop strategies to improve it.

Accurate, minimally invasive long-term ECG monitor can have far reaching benefits for patients, both in routine clinical practice and research.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial.
  • Male or Female.
  • Aged 18 years or above.
  • History of paroxysmal and persistent AF.
  • Dual-chamber pacemaker, Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) device with a functioning atrial lead, able to record electrograms and remote monitoring.

排除标准

  • Diagnosis of permanent AF.
  • Contra-indications for implantable cardiac monitor.
  • Unable to comply with the follow-up schedule.

结局指标

主要结局

Assessment of Performance of Confirm Rx ICM and Reveal LINQ ICM in Detecting AF Episodes in Comparison to CIED

时间窗: During follow-up (6 months)

To assess the performance of the Confirm Rx™ ICM and Reveal LINQ™ ICM in detecting clinically significant AF episodes (episodes longer than 6 minutes) in comparison to CIED (gold standard). Confirm Rx and Reveal LINQ™ ICM sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be calculated for AF episodes longer than 6 minutes.

次要结局

  • Comparison of Changes in R-wave Amplitude Following Implantation in Both ICMs.(During follow-up (6 months))
  • To Compare the Transmission Success Rate of Both Devices.(During follow-up (6 months))
  • To Compare the Number of Patient-activated Recordings That Contains Symptoms.(During follow-up (6 months))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Tim Betts MD MBChB FRCP

Primary Investigator

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验