跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03312192
NCT03312192撤回不适用

Stand-Alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating for 1-2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis

Rush University Medical Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2017年7月17日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
试验地点
2
主要终点
Clinical Improvement - Change in Baseline Visual analogue Score (VAS) for Pain

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results between two different techniques for ACDF: 1. Stand-alone ACDF, which means the placement of an interbody device (cage) without anterior fixation or plating; 2. ACDF with and interbody cage and anterior plating for fixation. Both of these procedures are commonly performed at Rush with unclear advantage of one procedure over the other. Both have been associated with good to excellent clinical outcomes. The devices used in this study are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

详细描述

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one the most common procedures performed by spine surgeons. Although ACDF with autologous bone graft and anterior plating is commonly performed, this procedure may be associated with postoperative dysphagia, significant costs and adjacent segment pathology. To address these concerns, a number of surgeons have opted to utilize an interbody cage in a stand-alone fashion with good to excellent results. However, the published data is limited and currently there in no consensus among spine surgeons regarding the best technique to achieve fusion and improve clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients undergoing a primary 1- to 2-level ACDF
  • (a) Diagnosis: myelopathy, radiculopathy, myeloradiculopathy, stenosis, herniated nucleus pulposus, degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, osteophytic complexes, and foraminal stenosis
  • Patients able to provide informed consent

排除标准

  • Cervical spine trauma

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical Improvement - Change in Baseline Visual analogue Score (VAS) for Pain

时间窗: 6 months

Patients will be asked to complete the VAS to measure their pain prior to surgery and at their preoperative office visit(s) or just prior to surgery in the preoperative waiting area. Scores at the 6 month follow up office visit will be compared to baseline

次要结局

  • Dysphagia(6 months)
  • Fusion Rates(6 months)
  • Clinical Improvement - Change in baseline 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey at 6 months(6 months)
  • Clinical Improvement - Change in baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6 months(6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Carla Edwards

Clinical Research Manger

Rush University Medical Center

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验