Constructive Debriefing
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 34
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- learning scores
研究概览
简要总结
Purposes: This study was set out to measure the effectiveness of constructive debriefing on procedural skills and satisfaction of nursing students in the low-fidelity context in comparison to traditional debriefing.
Method: The randomized controlled (Parallel double blinded) trial design was used.
Participant: Out of 51 approached, 34 students were selected from the list of participants by a data collector using simple random sampling technique. Following, block randomization was applied using Microsoft Excel to create two equivalent (n=17) groups i.e. experimental and non-experimental.
Setting: The study was conducted in private college of nursing Islamabad Pakistan Intervention: The experimental group received constructive debriefing and non-experimental group received the traditional debriefing. The data were collected using suctioning, sterile dressing skills checklist, and debriefing reflection subscale of Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 27 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Students who were enrolled in the Adult Health Nursing (AHN) course were included in the study
排除标准
- •Studentsnts who were repeating the course and were absent for two or more days during skills demonstration and signing off were excluded
研究组 & 干预措施
CONSTRUCTIVE DEBRIEFING
interventional group
干预措施: constructive debriefing (Other)
traditional debriefing
noninterventional group
结局指标
主要结局
learning scores
时间窗: 8months
learning scores of participant
次要结局
- satisfaction level(8months)
研究者
Bushra Sultan
Bushra Sultan
Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University