跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06766383
NCT06766383已完成不适用

Feasibility Study of Using GPT for History-taking Training in Medical Education

zhen wang1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 56 人开始时间: 2024年10月7日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
56
试验地点
1
主要终点
structured clinical examination to measure students' abilities in history taking

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether AI-based simulated patient training can improve clinical reasoning and history-taking skills in medical students. The main questions it aims to answer is:

Does GPT-based simulated patient training improve medical students' history-taking skills compared to traditional role-playing methods?

Participants will:

Participants in the intervention group perform medical history-taking conversations with an AI-simulated patient. Receive AI-generated structured feedback on their performance. The control group participated in role-playing exercises with instructors who acted as patients, receiving feedback after each session. Complete standardized assessments to evaluate clinical reasoning and decision-making skills.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Medical education enrollment:
  • Students enrolled in a medical or health-related professional program.
  • Clinical coursework completion:
  • Students who have completed basic clinical coursework, including foundational topics in patient communication and clinical reasoning.
  • Participants aged 18-30 years to reflect typical medical student demographics.
  • Language proficiency:
  • Adequate proficiency in the language used for the study (e.g., English) to effectively interact with the AI-simulated patient and understand feedback.
  • Willingness and availability:
  • Students who provide informed consent and are willing to participate in all required study activities, including training sessions and assessments.
  • Access to technology:
  • Ability to access and use the necessary technology, such as a computer and internet connection, to complete the simulated patient interactions.

排除标准

  • Non-medical background:
  • Students not enrolled in medical or related health professions programs. Students in early years of study who have not completed basic clinical coursework.
  • Technical limitations:
  • Inability to access or use the required technology (e.g., computer or online platforms).
  • Time constraints:
  • Inability to complete all required training and assessments within the study timeline.
  • Language barriers:
  • Insufficient proficiency in the language used for the study (e.g., English) to effectively communicate or understand the simulated patient interactions.
  • Health-related factors:
  • Conditions that may impair participation, such as significant hearing or vision impairment, or severe psychological conditions.
  • Prior participation in similar studies:
  • Students who have already participated in studies involving similar AI-based simulated patient training or feedback.

结局指标

主要结局

structured clinical examination to measure students' abilities in history taking

时间窗: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

Pre and Post Training: This primary endpoint measures improvements in students' clinical skills using a structured clinical examination conducted both before and after the training. The total score is out of 100 points, aggregated from four components: History Collection (30 points): Assesses the level of detail in the chief complaint and symptoms (10 points), the ability to understand and identify patient information (10 points), and the appropriateness and logic of follow-up questions (10 points). Clinical Reasoning (30 points): Evaluates the thoroughness of diagnostic thinking (15 points) and efficiency in processing information and forming clinical judgments (15 points). Communication Skills (20 points): Includes interaction with patients (10 points) and clarity of information delivery (10 points). Professional Behavior (20 points): Measures adherence to clinical procedural norms (10 points) and professional attitude towards patients (1

次要结局

  • Training Feedback Assessment(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks)
  • Student Satisfaction Survey(From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks)

研究者

发起方
zhen wang
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

zhen wang

physician

The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验