跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02296515
NCT02296515已完成不适用

Intrathecal Pump Refill: Reservoir Fill Port Identification by Palpation Versus Ultrasound,a Mono-centre Prospective Comparison Study in Patients Undergoing Regular Intrathecal Pump Refill

Dr med. Paolo Maino Viceprimario Anestesiologia1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 33 人开始时间: 2014年10月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
33
试验地点
1
主要终点
The primary endpoint will be the number of attempts to enter the reservoir fill port.

研究概览

简要总结

Reservoir fill port identification by palpation versus ultrasound,a mono-centre prospective comparison study in patients undergoing regular intrathecal pump refill

详细描述

Intrathecal drug therapy with implantable intrathecal pumps is being utilized increasingly for the treatment of chronic refractory pain and spasticity. However, performing the regular refill procedures of the pumps with the commonly performed "blind" technique caries the potential risk of medication injection into the subcutaneous tissue, which can lead to an overdose.

Objective

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of the ultrasound-guided technique for the refill procedure compared to the blind technique in subjects undergoing regular refills of their intrathecal pumps for the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain or spasticity.

Study design: Mono-center prospective efficacy and reliability study comparing two approaches to enter the fill port. Study population: The investigators will include patients with an intrathecal pump for the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain or spasticity, undergoing regular refills of their intrathecal pumps at our Centro Terapia del Dolore at the Ospedale Italiano a Viganello(EOC, Switzerland). Intervention: Two different experienced clinicians will perform one time the blind technique and two times the ultrasound-guided technique on all patients.sample size calculations can be performed. The sample size i.e. n=25 patients in NSI-TD-001 Protocol v. 1.0 Final: August 4th, 2014 Confidential Page 31 of 40 total assessed 6 six times is therefore based on practical grounds related feasibility to duration of inclusion (i.e. one year). This would imply 50 paired assessments for both fill port accuracy assessment and intra-rater reliability. The investigators believe based on clinical experience that this number would suffice to detect a difference between methods. Likewise, although no formal power calculation are available for ICC based reliability assessment, as a rule of thumb 50 paired assessments are usually considered adequate to evaluate intra-rater liability.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18 years or older at the time of enrollment;
  • The patients are treated for chronic non-malignant pain or spasticity with an intrathecal
  • programmable infusion pump and undergo regular refills of their pumps in our clinic.
  • Able to provide adequate given written, informed consent to participate in this study.

排除标准

  • patient refusal to participate or provide informed consent standard exclusions; pregnancy, lactation, treatment with other investigational products.
  • other clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction,
  • cardiovascular disease).
  • infection at the puncture site -participation in another study.-

结局指标

主要结局

The primary endpoint will be the number of attempts to enter the reservoir fill port.

时间窗: 1 YearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients in total

The time to perform refill, and patient comfort associated with both procedures will be registered in order to assess user friendliness of both procedures.

次要结局

  • reliability of the US guided procedure(1 YearYearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients)
  • - time to perform refill (usability)(1 YearYearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients)
  • patient discomfort(1 YearYearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients)
  • the number of skin puncturs(1 YearYearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients in total)
  • - determine if BMI has an impact on the accuracy (the number of attempts) of the two techniques(1 YearYearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients)

研究者

发起方
Dr med. Paolo Maino Viceprimario Anestesiologia
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Dr med. Paolo Maino Viceprimario Anestesiologia

Dr. med deputy Head of the Anesthisiology

Ospedale Regionale di Lugano

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验