Understanding the Impact of Drug Shortages on Oncology Care Delivery
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 发起方
- 试验地点
- 6
- 主要终点
- Change to less effective treatment
研究概览
简要总结
This trial studies the impact of drug shortages on oncology care delivery. Gathering information about cancer drug shortages over time may help researchers improve access to drugs during times of shortages.
详细描述
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To prospectively estimate the proportion of National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) community practices that experience a cancer care delivery problem attributable to a drug shortage of infusional therapeutic oncology drugs.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To prospectively estimate the rate of cancer care delivery problems attributable to a drug shortage of infusional therapeutic oncology drugs for patient populations treated with: a) all cancer drugs, b) all cancer drugs in shortage, and c) each individual cancer drug in shortage.
II. To assess strategies practices used during drug shortages (e.g., manage costs, stockpile, hire staff).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Be a primary affiliate or sub-affiliate of an NCORP community site or minority underserved (M/U) community site that is affiliated with the University of Rochester Cancer Center (URCC) NCORP Research Base
- •Practice sites must have a valid Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) identification number
- •Practice sites may or may not share a pharmacy
- •Provide infusional chemotherapy treatment (either inpatient or outpatient)
排除标准
- •Practices sites without valid CTEP identification (ID)
- •Practice sites that do not provide infusional chemotherapy
结局指标
主要结局
Change to less effective treatment
时间窗: Up to 12 months
Assessed with the Drug Shortage Incident Report. When the primary oncology team is developing a recommended treatment plan and the preferred drug is in shortage, even if the patient never was treated with the drug in shortage, this is considered a "change" for this study. The determination of "less effective" will be made by the primary oncology team. "Less effective" treatments can include those that are not the best options per guidelines through the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, and other organizations that establish guidelines for oncology care. Given that the primary oncology team is in charge of the patient's care, they will determine if they think the "change" is "less effective" based on their understanding of the patient's diagnosis and clinical situation.
Proportion of NCORP community practices that experience a cancer care delivery problem attributable to a drug shortage of infusional therapeutic oncology drugs
时间窗: Baseline up to 12 months
Each incident is defined by the drug in shortage and by each cancer care delivery decision (e.g., whenever a recommended treatment plan is developed). All incidents are collected de-identified and aggregated to the practice site. For each drug in shortage during the year (4 quarters) of observation, will determine the number of practices reporting a care delivery problem due to each drug during any quarter and total number of practices treating patients with the drug during any quarter. Will calculate the proportion of affected practices among practices treating patients with the drug as the ratio of these two numbers. Will calculate mean, median, range and evaluate the shape of the distribution of drug specific estimates.
Change to more toxic treatment
时间窗: Up to 12 months
Assessed with the Drug Shortage Incident Report. When the primary oncology team is developing a recommended treatment plan and the preferred drug is in shortage, even if the patient never was treated with the drug in shortage, this is considered a "change" for this study. The practice site staff will verify with the primary oncology team that they perceive this cancer care delivery issue (e.g., change to another drug) to be more toxic than what was intended. Whether the "change" led to a more toxic treatment or regimen will be determined by the primary oncology team. Teams can utilize their pharmacy staff to help determine if the new treatment or regimen has data to support that it would lead to higher toxicity.
Delay in treatment
时间窗: Up to 12 months
Assessed with the Drug Shortage Incident Report. Each incident is defined by the drug in shortage and by each cancer care delivery decision (e.g., whenever a recommended treatment plan is developed). Any time there is a change to a treatment regimen due to a drug shortage, the primary oncology team should determine whether or not they perceive this change to be a problem for a patient. When there is a drug shortage that results in a potential issue (e.g., missed dose), the practice site staff will verify with the primary oncology team that they actually perceived this cancer care delivery issue as a problem. The same patient may experience multiple cancer care delivery problems over the course of their treatment. Each of these problems should be reported, de-identified, as separate incidents as they occur.
Medication error/near miss
时间窗: Up to 12 months
Assessed with the Drug Shortage Incident Report. When there is a shortage of oncology drugs and there is a change in dose, administration, or drug, there can be medication errors in dose or concentration (e.g., drug was supposed to be diluted, but is not). A near miss is when the primary oncology team identifies a potential medication error but the drug was not administered to the patient. Oncology teams should rely on pharmacy staff to help identify and define medication errors and near misses.
次要结局
- Strategies practices use(Baseline up to 12 months)
- Rate of cancer care delivery problems (CCDPs)(Up to 12 months)
研究者
Elaine Hill
Assistant Professor
University of Rochester
