跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02858947
NCT02858947已完成不适用

Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Class II Posterior Composite Restorations Placed With Different Techniques and Flowable Composite Linings in Endodontically Treated Teeth

Ondokuz Mayıs University0 个研究点目标入组 37 人开始时间: 2011年3月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
37
主要终点
Clinical performance evaluation of different composite resin restorations with USPHS criteria

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of direct resin composite restorations placed with different placement techniques (incremental or bulk) and with different flowable linings (conventional or bulk-fill flowable) used in open-sandwich technique, in endodontically treated Class II cavities (mesio-occlusal or disto-occlusal), in a randomized controlled comparison.

详细描述

Forty-seven pairs Class II (mesio-occlusal or disto-occlusal) composite restorations were placed in 37 patients. In all cavities, Adper Single Bond 2 was used. In one of the cavities of each pair, a conventional flowable composite, Aelite Flo, was applied in approximately 2mm thick, and the remaining cavity was restored incrementally with GrandioSO. In the second cavity, a bulk-fill flowable composite, x-tra base, was applied in approximately 4 mm thick in bulk increments and the remaining 2mm occlusal part of the cavity was restored with GrandioSO. All cavities were restored with open-sandwich technique by the same operator. At baseline and after 6-month, 1-, 2- and 3-year follow-up visits, restorations were evaluated by Modified USPHS criteria.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
19 Years 至 41 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Permanent premolars and molars without any restorations were included in the study. Every tooth included in the study had neighboring teeth and were in occlusion to antagonistic teeth.

排除标准

  • Patients were excluded who needed indirect restorations due to significant loss of tooth structure, known allergies to product ingredients, had poor oral hygiene and a history of bruxism.

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical performance evaluation of different composite resin restorations with USPHS criteria

时间窗: three years

Every year in three years period

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Ondokuz Mayıs University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Emel Karaman

Assistant professor

Ondokuz Mayıs University

相似试验