跳至主要内容
临床试验/ISRCTN36773557
ISRCTN36773557已完成不适用

A randomised open comparison of intravaginal APL202 (25 µg) followed by 25 µg after 4 and 8 hours versus 3 mg of dinoprostone as a vaginal tablet followed by 3 mg after 6 hours in the induction of labour in multiparous subjects

Alliance Pharmaceuticals Ltd (UK)0 个研究点目标入组 622 人开始时间: 2010年1月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
622

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

性别
Female

入选标准

  • 1. Subjects, aged 18 years or over, who had at least one previous term pregnancy suitable for induction of labour with prostaglandin cervical ripening agents
  • 2. Pregnancy duration of at least 37 weeks
  • 3. Subjects with an unfavourable cervix defined as a Bishop Score of less than 9
  • 4. Signed informed consent

排除标准

  • 1. Subjects requiring insulin to control their diabetes. Subjects with controlled Type II or gestational diabetes that do not require insulin may be included.
  • 2. Subjects with a multiple pregnancy
  • 3. Subjects in whom oxytocic drugs are generally contraindicated or where prolonged contractions of the uterus are considered inappropriate, i.e:
  • 3.1. History of caesarean section or major uterine surgery
  • 3.2. Cephalopelvic disproportion
  • 3.3. Foetal malpresentation
  • 3.4. Clinical suspicion or definite evidence of pre-existing foetal distress
  • 3.5. History of difficult labour and/or traumatic delivery
  • 3.6. Grand multiparae with over 5 previous term pregnancy
  • 4. Subjects with an intercurrent vaginal, systemic or ascending infection
  • 5. Subjects with clinical suspicion or definite evidence of placenta praevia or unexplained vaginal bleeding during their pregnancy. Occasional spotting, considered by the investigator to be of no clinical significance concerning the use of cervical ripening agents and having a reasonable explanation (e.g. cervical ectropion, cervical polyps), is not a reason for exclusion.
  • 6. Subjects with active cardiac, pulmonary, renal or hepatic disease
  • 7. Subjects with abruptio placenta. Abruptio placenta in a previous pregnancy is not a reason for exclusion.
  • 8. Subjects with ruptured membranes
  • 9. Subjects with a known allergy to prostaglandins or other constituents of the tablets
  • 10. Subjects with any contraindication to vaginal delivery (e.g. active genital herpes)

研究者

发起方
Alliance Pharmaceuticals Ltd (UK)

相似试验