跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06595446
NCT06595446招募中不适用

A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Early vs Late Stent Removal Following Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit Formation for Bladder Cancer

Western University, Canada1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2024年11月12日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Complication rates

研究概览

简要总结

Bladder cancer is the 4th most common cancer in men and 5th most common type of cancer in Canada. Urothelial cancer accounts for approximately 90% of malignancies. At diagnosis, over 75% of cases are classified as non-muscle invasive (NMIBC), and with appropriate treatment, the majority of these patients achieve positive outcomes. The progression rate of NMIBC to Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) varies between 5-50% at 5 years dependent on histopathological features such as grade, stage, presence of CIS and age (Carcinoma in Situ). The optimal treatment of MIBC (T2-T4N0M0) consists of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by Radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (RCUD). In the last couple of decades, RCUD has also gained attention for treating patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Despite advancements in surgical techniques and the rise of minimally invasive alternatives, complications after surgery remain frequent, with morbidity rates of approximately 50%.

Several uncertainties persist in surgical practice, including the role of perioperative ureteric stenting during RCUD. Perioperative ureteric stenting is intended to minimize urinary leakage from the newly created uretero-enteric anastomosis and to prevent early obstruction caused by anastomotic swelling. However, stenting may increase the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and necessitate additional follow-up for stent removal. Peng et al. conducted the most recent systematic review in 2021, demonstrating that ureteral stents in RCUD were linked to higher rates of anastomotic strictures. Their review did not provide evidence that these stents were more effective than not using stents in preventing post-diversion urinary leakage. The review underscored the scarcity of prospective randomized controlled trials examining the safety and effectiveness of stenting in this context. The sole prospective (non-randomized) study assessing stent dwell / retention time after RCUD demonstrated early stent removal (2 weeks) had decreased 90-day readmissions and UTIs.

Therefore, the investigators aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomized trial to evaluate patients undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation to receive either early stent removal (5-7 days) or late stent removal (4-6 weeks).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult patients (18 years or older) undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation for bladder cancer
  • Able to give informed written consent to participate.

排除标准

  • Treatment without curative intent (cT4b, salvage or palliative cystectomies);
  • Patients undergoing alternative forms of urinary diversion (e.g. continent cutaneous urinary diversion or orthotopic neobladder formation)
  • Patients previously received abdominal/pelvic radiotherapy
  • Patients with concomitant upper urinary tract cancer

结局指标

主要结局

Complication rates

时间窗: within 30 days:

Feasibility Outcomes

时间窗: 1 year

1. Recruitment Metrics: * Recruitment Rates: Number of participants recruited versus the number of eligible patients. * Screen Failures: Number of patients screened but found ineligible. * Non-Consenting Rates: Number of eligible patients who decline participation. 2. Protocol Adherence: * Randomization Process Success: Rate of successful randomizations without errors. * Protocol Violations / Deviations: Incidents where clinical needs required deviation from the protocol. * Completion Rate: Proportion of participants who complete the study according to the protocol.

次要结局

  • Complication rates(within 1 year)
  • Readmission rates(within 90 days)

研究者

发起方
Western University, Canada
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Nicholas Power

Principal Investigator

Western University, Canada

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验