Comparison of Efficacy Between Linear Versus Purse String Skin Closure at Loop Ileostomy Reversal. A Randomized Control Trial.

Loop ileostomy reversal is a commonly performed surgical procedure; however, it is associated with a considerable risk of postoperative complications, particularly surgical site infection (SSI). Reported SSI rates after stoma closure range from 4% to over 20%, making it one of the most frequent causes of postoperative morbidity. The development of SSI not only delays wound healing but also contributes to prolonged hospital stay, increased healthcare costs, and reduced patient satisfaction.

Multiple techniques for skin closure following ileostomy reversal have been described, with conventional linear closure and purse-string closure being the most widely practiced. Linear closure involves primary approximation of the wound edges, resulting in complete closure of the skin. In contrast, the purse-string technique leaves a small central opening that allows continuous drainage of wound exudate, which may reduce bacterial colonization and lower the risk of infection.

Previous studies have suggested that purse-string closure may be associated with lower SSI rates and improved cosmetic outcomes compared to linear closure. However, linear closure remains widely used due to its technical simplicity and shorter operative time. Despite available evidence, there is still variability in clinical practice, and further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the optimal technique.

This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, MTI-Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. A total of 252 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: linear skin closure (Group A) and purse-string skin closure (Group B). Block randomization was used to ensure balanced group allocation.

All patients underwent ileostomy reversal according to standardized surgical protocols. Preoperative optimization, including management of comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension, was performed as per institutional guidelines. Postoperatively, patients were monitored during their hospital stay and followed up for 30 days to assess outcomes.