A Contemporary Review of Surgical Approaches in Pelvic Exenterative Surgery
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 1,000
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Resection status
研究概览
简要总结
Minimally-invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have revolutionised the approach to rectal cancer surgery. With increasing experience, surgeons have began to utilise these platforms increasingly in the context of pelvic exenteration (PE). This observational retrospective review plans to assess the volume of PE being performed on a global basis and to assess the comparative outcomes associated with each technique in order to assess the optimal approach to radical pelvic surgery.
详细描述
Pelvic exenteration (extended pelvic multi-visceral resection) is a radical procedure that offers potential long-term cure in appropriately selected cases of locally advanced and recurrent pelvic cancers. It was first described by Alexander Brunschwig in 1948 as a viable palliative option for advanced gynaecological cancer. However, over the last 70 years, changes in surgical oncology practices have seen its role extended to include other advanced non-gynaecological cancers (locally advanced colorectal, urological, and sarcomatous neoplasms).
Although these procedures pose a significant challenge for the operating surgeon, improved surgical techniques, technology, and reconstructive options have facilitated more radical resections. Despite improved surgical options, patients still have considerable post-operative morbidity and negative impact to quality of life. However, non-surgical management options result in poor prognosis with only 3% survival at five-years. Pelvic exenteration in appropriately-selected patients offers the only hope of long-term survival.
Over the last few decades with improved perioperative management and better surgical techniques, more aggressive visceral, soft tissue and bony resections are performed. The development of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) platforms has also evolved substantially, especially regarding pelvic surgery. There are some recent sporadic (low-volume) reports highlighting the potential role for MIS exenterative surgery, however many reports have been heterogeneous and single-centre. The aim of this retrospective review is to compare the volume, disease characteristics and surgical outcomes between open, laparoscopic and robotic pelvic exenterations, and to assess the initial experience of MIS platforms in multiple specialist centres worldwide.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Histologically proven locally advanced or recurrent RECTAL cancer
- •Aged over 18 years
- •Undergoing a multi-visceral extended pelvic resection
- •Procedure took place within the specified timeframe (July 2016 - July 2021)
排除标准
- •Extra-pelvic/ non-resectable metastatic or peritoneal disease
- •Palliative pelvic exenteration
- •Insufficient patient follow-up data
结局指标
主要结局
Resection status
时间窗: July 2016 - July 2021
Completeness of the surgical resection (R0, R1 or R2)
次要结局
- Operation time(July 2016 - July 2021)
- Return of bowel function(July 2016 - July 2021)
- Morbidity(July 2016 - July 2021)
- Blood loss(July 2016 - July 2021)
- Conversion rate(July 2016 - July 2021)
- Length of stay(July 2016 - July 2021)
- Analgesic Requirements(July 2016 - July 2021)
研究者
Professor Des Winter
Professor Desmond C Winter
St Vincent's University Hospital, Ireland
