跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03342560
NCT03342560已完成不适用

Beyond Confounders: Addressing Source of Measurement Variability and Error in Shear Wave Elastography

Massachusetts General Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2017年6月29日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
30
试验地点
1
主要终点
Deviations From Suggested Guidelines- Any Effect on Agreement

研究概览

简要总结

Chronic liver disease is a major problem in the general population and there is an unmet need to diagnose(and screen) for liver disease with using noninvasive, cost-effective and sensitive techniques.The investigators hypothesize that variation using ultrasound elastography for the estimation of stage of liver fibrosis and steatosis in patients with diffuse liver disease exists due to different methods of measurements, and/or different systems. The proposed investigation is a cross-sectional study using ultrasound elastography and fat quantification modalities. The investigators are planning to enroll 30 subjects 18 years old and older in whom diffuse liver disease is suspected, and who have undergone non-focal liver biopsy in the past 6 months or are scheduled to undergo biopsy within 3 months of enrollment, as part of their routine clinical care. The investigators will use 4 different ultrasound devices with their shear wave elastography and speed of sound functions.

Specific aims;

  • Compare shear wave elastography(SWE) measurements from different ultrasound systems; using histopathology as reference standards.
  • Assess intra-operator and inter-operator reliability by measuring variability in elastography values by two operators on a single system.
  • Determine the effect of deviations from guidelines(less number of measurements and measurements during active breath)

详细描述

Liver disease and cirrhosis are important causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States and are a major public health problem with 40,000 deaths and more than 1.4 billion dollars spent on medical services. Hepatic fibrosis is the final common pathway for many different liver insults and is known to be a dynamic process, which is reversible if diagnosed early and treated. If untreated, fibrosis eventually progresses to cirrhosis, which is irreversible. The diagnosis of fibrosis relies on liver biopsy (the gold standard) however, is an invasive procedure with risks and sampling errors. Indirect biomarkers of fibrogenesis can measure some of these components to determine categories of fibrosis, with a sensitivity and specificity of 47% and 90% respectively.It is shown in the literature that, fat content of liver is related with fibrosis development. Biopsy is accepted as the most accurate technique to assess liver fat and fibrosis amount.

Fibrotic livers demonstrate increased stiffness, a property that can be measured using technology named Ultrasound Elastography or sonoelastography (SWE). SWE is performed by insonating the patient with a low energy, amplitude, and frequency shear wave created by a vibrating probe. The propagated wave travels faster with increasing fibrosis: the stiffer the tissue, the faster the shear wave propagates. A pulse-echo ultrasound acquisition allows measurement of the wave velocity and the results are presented as kilopascals (kPa). Prior reports have described sensitivity and specificity for liver fibrosis detection of 80% and 97% respectively for SWE. The benefits of SWE are that it is inexpensive, reproducible, painless, rapid (< 10 min), easy to perform, and can be used for diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring disease progression.

The objective of this study is to compare the variation in elastography values and study the factors that might cause these variations.

The proposed investigation is a cross-sectional study using ultrasound elastography. The investigators are planning to enroll 30 subjects 18 years old and older in whom diffuse liver disease is suspected, and who have undergone non-focal liver biopsy in the past 6 months or are scheduled to undergo biopsy within 3 months of enrollment, as part of their routine clinical care.

All subjects will be required to come to the MGH main campus for 2 study visits within 60 days of each other. In addition, subjects will need to fast for at least 4 hours prior to study visits

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Adult Patients
  • •Men or Woman
  • •Suspected diffuse liver disease and have had a liver biopsy within the last 6 months or are scheduled for a liver biopsy in the next 3 months.
  • •Consent to participate in the study

排除标准

  • •Pregnancy
  • •Acute illness/ cognitive impairment resulting in inability to cooperate with ultrasound
  • •Patients that do not consent to ultrasound examination

研究组 & 干预措施

30 Patients with known liver biopsy results

Experimental

Patients with chronic liver disease with known biopsy results

干预措施: Sonographic SWE measurements with 4 different ultrasound systems (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Deviations From Suggested Guidelines- Any Effect on Agreement

时间窗: Visit 1 and Visit 2, an average of 2.5 hours for each visit

We collected guideline suggested shear wave elastography measurements from 20 patients. Guidelines suggest collecting 1) 10 measurements, 2) Asking patient to hold breath during the measurements. As a deviation from guideline suggestions, we collected measurements during free breath movements without asking patient to hold breath. As a deviation from the guideline suggestions, fewer number of measurements (3 measurements) were collected with asking the patient to hold breath during the measurements. All measurements were collected using one type of ultrasound system. All measurements were collected by 2 operators in 2 visits.

Interoperator and Intraoperator Agreement in m/s and kPA Units

时间窗: Visit 1 and Visit 2, an average of 2.5 hours for each visit

In 20 patients we collected 10 shear wave elastography measurements in m/s and kPA units. Using one of the available ultrasound systems, 2 operators collected these measurements in 2 visits. Theoretically, m/s to kPA conversion can be made using an equation. However, some systems provide opportunity to get data in both units. Although algebraically m/s and kPA can be converted to each other, we found some minor differences in terms of inter-operator and intra-operator agreement.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Anthony Samir

Service Chief,Body Ultrasound Department of Radiology, Assistant Professor at Harvard Medical School

Massachusetts General Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Beyond Confounders: Addressing Source of Measurement... | 临床试验