24- Month Clinical Performance of Injectable and Conventional Resin Composites in Class I Cavities
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Marginal Adaptation
研究概览
简要总结
Purpose of research: Evaluation and comparison of 24-month clinical performance of injectable and conventional resin composites in class I cavities.
详细描述
The mechanical properties of conventional resin composites have been tried to be improved. In addition to the developed mechanical properties, the need for easy and fast application led to the development of flowable composites. Flowable composites have lower filler ratio than conventional hybrid composites so they are less rigid and have lower modulus of elasticity. For these reasons, the use of flowable composites in areas that may be exposed to high forces, especially occlusal cavities, is not recommended. Today, it is aimed to increase the wear resistance by increasing the amount of filler in flowable composites and producing injectable composites. A new product recently introduced to the market, a high-strength nano-filled injectable composite material, GC's G-ænial Universal Injectable(Tokyo,Japan), was also included in the study. This is a low-viscosity composite in which modifications have been made to provide a product with high wear resistance and depth of cure to make it suitable for posterior restorations.
One lesion in each patient will be randomly assigned to be restored using either the G-aenial Universal Injectable or Filtek Z250 resin composites. The adhesive, G2-BOND Universal will be used for adhesive procedures. The clinical procedure for the restorations will be performed by a single operator. The restorations will be evaluated by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 24 months in accordance with the modified USPHS criteria. Data will be statistically analyzed using the Chi-square and Cochran Q tests (p < 0.05).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 35 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Healthy individuals who do not have any systemic disease that prevents restorative treatment
- •Individuals between the ages of 18-35
- •Brushing your teeth twice a day
- •Having at least 20 teeth in occlusion and at least 2 occlusal lesions with antagonist teeth in the opposite arch
- •Volunteer individuals who agree to participate in the research and sign the informed consent form and who have undergone initial periodontal treatment will be included in the study.
排除标准
- •Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- •Individuals with advanced periodontal disease
- •Individuals using removable partial dentures
- •Individuals with bruxism
- •Individuals with malocclusion
- •Patients with known allergies to resin-based restorative materials and bonding agents
- •Patients with a history of allergy to local anesthesia
- •Endodontic treatment, teeth that need pulp capping or endodontic treatment is available
结局指标
主要结局
Marginal Adaptation
时间窗: From baseline to 24 month
Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal adaptation. Marginal adaptation was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed . Scores; Alfa: Closely adapted, no visible crevice. Bravo: Visible crevice, explorer will penetrate. Charlie: Crevice in which dentin is exposed
Marginal Staining
时间窗: From baseline to 24 month
Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal staining. Marginal staining was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed . Scores: Alfa: No discoloration. Bravo: Discoloration without. Charlie: Discoloration with penetration in pulpal direction
Retention
时间窗: From baseline to 24 month
Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: No loss of restorative material. Charlie: Any loss of restorative material
Postoperative sensitivity
时间窗: From baseline to 24 month
Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: Not present. Bravo: sensitive but diminishing in intensity. Charlie:constant sensitivity, not diminishing in intensity
Seconder caries
时间窗: From baseline to 24 month
Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: No caries present. Charlie: Caries present
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Aslı Ceren Terzi
Principal İnvestigator, Research Assistant
Hacettepe University
