跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06025617
NCT06025617进行中(未招募)不适用

Comprehensive Evaluation of a New Diagnostic Clinic for Functional Disorders - the DISTRESS Trial

Regionshospitalet Silkeborg1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 290 人开始时间: 2019年7月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
290
试验地点
1
主要终点
Healthcare services utilization (i.e. direct costs)

研究概览

简要总结

A Diagnostic Clinic for Functional Somatic Disorders (FSD) has been set up at the outpatient diagnostic center at Regionshospitalet Silkeborg. The objective of the clinic is to support General Practitioners (GPs) by offering early stage diagnostic evaluation of whether a patient has an FSD or the symptoms were caused by another physical illness or mental disorder.

As a novelty in this project, Internal Medicine consultants examine the patients for FSD, after having received training in diagnosing FSD by FSD experts. By performing diagnostic evaluation for physical diseases and FSD simultaneously, the investigators believe that the new clinic shall be able to accelerate the establishment of a final diagnosis for these patients who would otherwise likely undergo a protracted diagnostic course involving sequential evaluations at various specialty clinics.

The DISTRESS trial is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial which aims to evaluate the Diagnostic Clinic for FSD in terms of clinical cost-effectiveness outcomes.

详细描述

Functional Somatic Disorders (FSD) are conditions where patients present with characteristic patterns of physical symptoms, accompanied by impairment or disability. FSD is a clinical diagnosis for which no clinical or paraclinical tests at present have been found useable for establishing the diagnosis. The disorders range from mild and transient to severe, chronic and disabling, and are common in all medical settings, both in primary and secondary care. FSD is costly for society due to high health care use, and the reduction of patients' labor market participation. Arguably, insufficient diagnostic availability is part of the reason some patients develop more severe, chronic and disabling FSD. The Diagnostic Clinic for FSD was set up at Regionshospitalet to alleviate this diagnostic need in the secondary care setting.

The DISTRESS trial is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. After referral by their GP, patients are randomized 1:1 into two study arms: Intervention and Control. The referring GP must specify which diagnostic evaluations he/she requests both in the intervention and in the control group.

Intervention arm: Patients in this arm shall be examined by an internal medicine specialist trained in FSD diagnostic evaluation at The Diagnostic Clinic for FSD. After parallel evaluation for FSD and other physical conditions, patients are given their diagnosis, along with patient education in what FSD is, as well as a letter to their GP regarding recommended management and treatment options.

Control arm: The comparison group in the randomized clinical trial will receive diagnostic as usual at the Diagnostic center or elsewhere in the secondary sector in The Central Denmark Region.

In this clinical trial, the investigators aim to evaluate the effectiveness in terms of health-related utility improvement for the patients as well as the healthcare and societal costs and cost-effectiveness of the clinic, compared to diagnostic as usual.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Investigator)

盲法说明

Outcome data is blinded to the investigator during data analysis as to intervention vs. comparison arm assignment.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Study population:
  • Participants were drawn from the population of the Central Denmark Region. To be considered for inclusion, patients had to be referred by their GP.
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Being referred to the clinic by their GP due to symptoms consistent with a possible diagnosis of moderate or severe FSD.
  • Symptoms having been present for at least 6 months and no more than 3 years.
  • Having undergone at least 2 diagnostic evaluations (e.g. imaging studies or specialist evaluations) at physical specialty clinics or hospitals in the past year.
  • Being of ethnic western cultural upbringing.
  • Understands and speaks Danish fluently.

排除标准

  • Having another severe chronic disease which explains the reduced level of functioning.
  • Having been previously referred to or evaluated for FSD at this or another clinic specializing in functional disorders.
  • Previous diagnosis of FSD.
  • Alcohol or other substance-dependency or -abuse.
  • Emergent psychiatric illness or emergent elevated risk of harm to self or others requiring psychiatric evaluation for possible need of acute or sub-acute psychiatric hospitalization.
  • Current or prior diagnosis of psychosis (ICD10 F2x diagnosis), bipolar affective disorder (ICD10 F31.x diagnosis) or depression with psychotic symptoms (ICD10 F32.3 or F33.3 diagnosis).
  • Currently pregnant.

研究组 & 干预措施

Intervention arm

Experimental

Patients referred by their GP under suspicion of suffering from FSD are randomized to the intervention arm.

干预措施: Diagnostic evaluation at the Diagnostic Clinic for Functional Disorders (Other)

Control arm

Active Comparator

Patients referred by their GP under suspicion of suffering from FSD are randomized to "Diagnostic as usual" in the control arm.

干预措施: Diagnostic as usual (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Healthcare services utilization (i.e. direct costs)

时间窗: 12 months prior to randomization and 12 months' follow-up

Comparison of healthcare services utilization (of secondary and tertiary sector care) by the intervention group, compared to the control group. Data shall be drawn from Danish national and regional healthcare service registers.

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) (direct and indirect costs)

时间窗: 12 months prior to randomization and 12 months' follow-up

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), comparing the intervention and the control group from both a healthcare (direct costs) and a societal perspective (indirect costs) combining data on incremental costs and incremental effects; adjusted for differences in mean utility score and mean costs at baseline (1 year prior to randomization).

次要结局

  • Effectiveness: Health-related quality of life (via the the Short Form 36 Total Score)(Baseline, 3- and 12-months' follow-up)
  • Public expenses associated with occupational status and social benefits (i.e. indirect costs)(12 months prior to randomization and 12 months' follow-up)
  • Effectiveness: Perceived physical health(Baseline, 3- and 12-months' follow-up)
  • Effectiveness (via Patient-reported Clinical Global Improvement)(At 3- and 12-months' follow-up)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Michael Moesmann Madsen

Clinical assistant and Medical Doctor

Regionshospitalet Silkeborg

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验