跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06799312
NCT06799312尚未招募不适用

Comparative Effectiveness of Ipsilesional High-frequency rTMS, Contralesional Continuous Burst Theta rTMS, and Sham rTMS, Each Combined With Physiotherapy, in Subacute Ischemic Stroke Upper Limb Recovery : Clinical, Neurophysiological and Radiological: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2025年3月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
90
主要终点
Score in Nottingham Sensory Assessment in points

研究概览

简要总结

To compare the efficacy of lesional high-frequency rTMS, contralesional cTBS, and sham stimulation in improving motor and cognitive recovery in post-stroke patients undergoing physiotherapy.

详细描述

Globally, stroke is the second leading cause of both death and disability. In 2020, the global prevalence of all stroke subtypes was 89.13 million cases, with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) comprising 76.47% of these, equating to 68.16 million cases . AIS presents a major global public health concern, given the wide range of disabilities it causes, including cognitive impairments. Survivors of stroke bear a significant burden due to the persistent disability they experience over time . Immediately following a stroke, motor impairments are accompanied by significant alterations in the affected primary motor cortex (M1) - detected by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)- resulting in reduced cortical excitability. This can be evidenced by the absence of recordable motor evoked potentials (MEPs), diminished MEP amplitudes, and increased resting motor threshold (rMT). Additionally, stroke can alter brain connectivity, particularly in terms of functional connectivity, which has implications for recovery. Neuroplasticity plays a crucial role in recovery after stroke, allowing the brain to reorganize and compensate for lost functions. Physiotherapy is a cornerstone of post-stroke rehabilitation, particularly for upper limb recovery and cognitive improvement, with early intervention associated with better outcomes. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promise in the early stages post-stroke, enhancing motor and cognitive recovery, particularly when applied within two weeks of stroke onset. MEPs can be used to monitor changes in cortical excitability and have been linked to both cognitive and motor recovery. Combining rTMS with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) allows for the assessment of both functional and structural brain changes, providing a deeper understanding of rTMS's therapeutic effects. DTI, through fractional anisotropy (FA), helps to evaluate white matter integrity, and studies have shown that increased FA correlates with motor recovery, making it a valuable tool in examining the structural changes induced by rTMS in stroke recovery. While high frequency rTMS targeting the ipsilesional motor cortex (M1) has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing motor recovery, contralesional continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) has shown promising results offering an alternative by modulating interhemispheric inhibition. However, no studies have directly compared the efficacy of these two paradigms against each other and sham stimulation in subacute stroke recovery. This study seeks to address this gap by comparing the outcomes of lesional high frequency rTMS, contralesional cTBS, and sham stimulation in combination with physiotherapy.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Both participants and investigators are blinded to the intervention type, with sham rTMS serving as the control for maintaining blinding integrity.

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •First-ever ischemic stroke, confirmed by imaging.
  • •Stroke affecting the non-dominant hemisphere (cortical or subcortical) within the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory.
  • •Acute to subacute stage of stroke (time since onset: 48 hours to 2 weeks).
  • •Ability to comply with the study protocol and interventions.

排除标准

  • •Hemorrhagic stroke or bilateral stroke.
  • •Severe cognitive impairment, defined as a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score <
  • •Contraindications to TMS, such as: History of epilepsy, Metallic implants in the head, Other contraindications based on TMS safety guidelines.
  • •Comorbid conditions that limit participation in rehabilitation.
  • •Severe neglect or aphasia that would impede participation in therapy.

研究组 & 干预措施

Ipsilesional high frequency rTMS combined with physiotherapy

Active Comparator

rTMS Protocol:

Stimulation delivered to the hand area of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1).

Frequency: 3 Hz.

Stimulation: 2 seconds per train, 37 trains per session.

Total pulses: 750 per session at 130% of the resting motor threshold (RMT).

Physiotherapy:

Patients receive standard physiotherapy sessions.

干预措施: Ipsilesional high frequency rTMS combined with physiotherapy (Device)

Contralesional Continuous Burst Theta rTMS (cTBS) + Physiotherapy

Active Comparator

rTMS Protocol:

Stimulation delivered to the contralesional primary motor cortex (M1).

Protocol: Continuous bursts of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 bursts per second.

Duration: 40 seconds per session.

Stimulation intensity: 70% of RMT with a biphasic TMS-induced current at a 45° angle to the midline.

Physiotherapy:

Patients receive standard physiotherapy sessions.

干预措施: Contralesional Continuous Burst Theta rTMS (cTBS) + Physiotherapy (Device)

Sham rTMS + Physiotherapy

Sham Comparator

Patients receive a sham stimulation designed to mimic rTMS without delivering active magnetic pulses.

This maintains blinding for participants and investigators.

Physiotherapy:

Patients receive standard physiotherapy sessions.

干预措施: Sham rTMS + Physiotherapy (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Score in Nottingham Sensory Assessment in points

时间窗: Within the time frame of the study , around 18 months

Score in modified Ashworth Scale in points

时间窗: Within the time frame of the study , around 18 months

Score in Fugl-Meyer assessment scale in points

时间窗: Within the time frame of the study , around 18 months

次要结局

  • Cortical Excitability Improvement(Within the time frame of the study , around 18 months)
  • Enhancement of White Matter Integrity(Within the time frame of the study , around 18 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mohammad Ahmad Mohammad Korayem

Assisstant lecturer

Assiut University

相似试验

Comparative Effectiveness of Ipsilesional... | 临床试验