跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07049237
NCT07049237已完成不适用

Effects of Evidence-Based Nursing Under a Quantitative Assessment Strategy on Cancer-Related Fatigue, Self-Management Ability, and Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 150 人开始时间: 2024年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
150
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in Cancer-Related Fatigue (CRF)

研究概览

简要总结

This prospective randomized controlled trial investigated the effects of an evidence-based nursing intervention under a quantitative assessment strategy (EB-NQAS), utilizing the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), on cancer-related fatigue, self-management ability, and quality of life in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Outcomes were compared to a group receiving routine nursing care.

详细描述

Lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy frequently experience significant cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and diminished quality of life (QoL), which may not be adequately addressed by conventional nursing approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an evidence-based nursing intervention guided by a quantitative assessment strategy (EB-NQAS). The EB-NQAS group (n=75) received personalized care plans developed by a dedicated nursing team. These plans were based on quantitative symptom assessment using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and incorporated evidence-based interventions for pain management (e.g., graded approach, music therapy, opioids), fatigue (e.g., activity plans, sleep optimization), nausea/vomiting prevention (e.g., prophylactic antiemetics, ginger, dietary advice), and psychological support (e.g., cognitive-behavioral therapy). Care plans were dynamically evaluated and adjusted based on daily and weekly ESAS monitoring. The control group (n=75) received routine nursing care, including standard health education, psychological support, dietary guidance, and adverse effect management. The study compared the effects of EB-NQAS versus routine nursing on CRF, self-management ability, QoL, and adverse events over a 3-month intervention period in 150 randomized lung cancer patients.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Pathologically or radiologically confirmed lung cancer (World Health Organization [WHO] 2021 diagnostic criteria).
  • •Scheduled to receive first-line chemotherapy (platinum-based regimen).
  • •Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score ≥
  • •Estimated survival time >6 months (assessed by treating oncologist).
  • •Normal mental and cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score ≥24).
  • •Voluntary participation and signed informed consent.

排除标准

  • •Concurrent severe organ dysfunction (Child-Pugh score ≥B for liver; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73m² for kidney).
  • •Active neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, epilepsy) affecting symptom reporting.
  • •Acute infectious diseases (e.g., tuberculosis with sputum positivity).
  • •Known allergies to chemotherapy drugs (e.g., platinum agents).
  • •Acute illnesses requiring hospitalization (e.g., pneumonia, myocardial infarction).
  • •Secondary malignancies (pathologically confirmed).
  • •Chemotherapy contraindications (e.g., uncontrolled heart failure).
  • •Inability to communicate in the local language (assessed via nurse interview).
  • •Concurrent radiotherapy or immunotherapy.
  • •Participation in other interventional clinical trials within 3 months.

研究组 & 干预措施

Evidence-Based Nursing Under Quantitative Assessment Strategy (EB-NQAS) Group

Experimental

Participants (n=75) received evidence-based nursing under a quantitative assessment strategy. This involved baseline assessment with ESAS; tailored care planning for pain, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and psychological distress (including CBT, activity/sleep plans, prophylactic antiemetics); and dynamic daily/weekly evaluation and adjustment of care based on ESAS scores.

干预措施: Evidence-Based Nursing Under Quantitative Assessment Strategy (EB-NQAS) (Behavioral)

Routine Nursing Care Group

Active Comparator

Participants (n=75) received standard nursing care as per hospital guidelines, including health education on lung cancer and chemotherapy, weekly 15-minute psychological support sessions, individualized dietary guidance, and verbal instructions on managing adverse effects.

干预措施: Routine Nursing Care (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Cancer-Related Fatigue (CRF)

时间窗: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post-intervention.

Assessed using the Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS). The PFS consists of 22 items covering 4 domains (behavioral, emotional, cognitive, physical), with each item scored from 0 to 10. The total score ranges from 0 to 220, where higher scores indicate more severe fatigue.

次要结局

  • Change in Quality of Life (QoL)(Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post-intervention.)
  • Change in Self-Management Ability(Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post-intervention.)
  • Incidence of Chemotherapy-Related Adverse Events(Assessed daily during the intervention period (up to 3 months).)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Feifei Wang

Principal investigator

The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验