跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03259906
NCT03259906终止不适用

Comparison of Functional Recovery After Distal Intra-articular Radius Fracture With a Dorsal Tilt Treated With an Anterior Plate Versus a Posterior Plate

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 12 人开始时间: 2017年1月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
12
试验地点
2
主要终点
Evaluation of functional recovery using the DASH questionnaire

研究概览

简要总结

For les intra-articular fractures, plate osteosynthesis is the indicated technique. Despite the absence of consensus, in recent years, the use of open reduction associated with internal plate fixation has considerably developed. Indeed, this therapeutic option allows a more anatomical reduction and stable fixation.

First-generation posterior plates presented complications related to the size of the plate, notably tendon lesions. Over the last ten years, a new generation of thinner anterior plates has reduced these complications.

In the literature, few studies have compared these two techniques in terms of functional and radiological outcomes. The hypothesis of this research is that osteosynthesis using a posterior plate is more effective than that with an anterior plate in terms of functional recovery in patients older than 45 years.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
60 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients who have provided written informed consent
  • Patients older than 45 years
  • Patients presenting a closed intra-articular fracture of the distal radius with a dorsal tilt (stages B2, C1, C2 and C3)

排除标准

  • Adults under guardianship
  • Patients without national health insurance cover
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Patients presenting other injuries in the same upper limb
  • Patients presenting injuries of the wrist or hand (scapholunate injury, fracture of the carpal bone or fingers)
  • Pre-trauma paralysis of the limb
  • Open fracture
  • Fracture with palmer tilt or extra-articular

结局指标

主要结局

Evaluation of functional recovery using the DASH questionnaire

时间窗: 6 months

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验