跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04707859
NCT04707859Unknown不适用

Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease 3

University of Aarhus1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,000 人开始时间: 2021年1月5日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
1,000
试验地点
1
主要终点
Diagnostic accuracy of Rb PET and 15-O PET

研究概览

简要总结

In a cohort of symptomatic patients referred to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), the investigators aim is:

  1. To investigate and compare the diagnostic precision of Rubidium Positron Emission Tomography (Rb PET) and 15O-water PET (15O-water PET) in patients where CCTA does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) using invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (ICA-FFR) as reference standard.
  2. To study the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of computed tomography fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) in patients where CCTA does not exclude obstructive CAD with ICA-FFR as reference standard.
  3. To validated a pre-test probability model including genetic and circulating biomarkers.
  4. To identify and characterize genetic risk variants and circulating biomarkers importance in developing CAD.
  5. To evaluate the bone mineral density in the hip and spine and correlate this to the degree of vascular calcification.

详细描述

CCTA has become the preferred diagnostic modality for symptomatic patients with low to intermediate risk of CAD. Of the patients examined, CCTA exclude cardiovascular disease in 70-80% with an excellent negative predictive value of more than 95%. Having a low positive predictive value, however, CCTA often overestimates the severity of CAD, especially in patients with moderate to severe coronary calcification. Following CCTA, patients are hence unnecessarily tested using golden standard ICA-FFR. These ICAs often show no obstructive coronary stenosis and are therefore not followed by revascularization. The issues outlined raises the question of whether it is possible (1) to make a more precise risk stratification and consequently better selection of patients prior to CCTA and (2) to reduce the number of patients referred for unnecessary ICAs following CCTA.

In patients with suspicion of coronary stenosis detected by CCTA, current guidelines recommend verification of myocardial ischemia. Dan-NICAD 3 investigate the diagnostic accuracy of advanced non-invasive myocardial perfusion imaging tests; Rb PET and 15O-water PET. These examinations have shown a high diagnostic accuracy in symptomatic patients with high risk of ischemic heart disease. However, the diagnostic accuracy is not investigated in patients as follow-up after CCTA. In addition, microcirculation may impact the correlation between PET and ICA-FFR which this study will investigate further.

An alternative way to increase the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA and thus avoid unnecessary downstream testing using ICA is to utilize the ability to extract physiological information from the anatomical CCTA images. CT-FFR has in previous studies shown promising results. In addition, calculated estimation of microcirculatiory function is under development and this study will validated these algorithms. Furthermore, the prognostic value of CT-FFR is unknown and will be tested in the pooled cohort of Dan-NICAD 1, 2 and 3.

Obtained during ICA, quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel wire-free approach for fast computation of FFR with potential to increase the global use of physiological lesion assessment. QFR is superior to traditional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions based on quantitative coronary analysis of ICA. However, disagreement between ICA-FFR and QFR has been identified in up to 20% of all measurements. QFR will be validated compared to PET and ICA-FFR.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 100 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with an indication for CCTA. Qualified patients who have signed a written informed consent form.

排除标准

  • Demography and co-existing cardiac morbidity specific: Age below 30 years, patients having a donor heart, a mechanic heart, or mechanical heart pump, suspicion acute coronary syndrome or previous revascularization.
  • CCTA: Pregnant women, including women who are potentially pregnant or lactating, reduced kidney function, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 40 mL/min or allergy to X-ray contrast medium.
  • PET: contra-indication for adenosine (severe asthma, advanced atrioventricular block, or critical aorta stenosis).

结局指标

主要结局

Diagnostic accuracy of Rb PET and 15-O PET

时间窗: ICA: 4 weeks after inclusion

Head-to-head comparison using ICA-FFR as reference standard stratified for CFR

次要结局

  • Predictive models of obstructive CAD(ICA: 4 weeks after inclusion)
  • Pre-test probability model of CAD(ICA: 4 weeks after inclusion)
  • Diagnostic accuracy of QFR(ICA: 4 weeks after inclusion)
  • Diagnostic accuracy of QFR vs. ICA-FFR(ICA: 4 weeks after inclusion)
  • Prognostic value of clinical, biomarker, genetic information(Follow-up: Myocardial infarction and mortality rates after 3+5+10 years)
  • Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR(ICA: 4 weeks after inclusion)
  • Effect of reduced myocardial perfusion defect on symptoms of angina pectoris(Re-PET: 12 months after inclusion)
  • Prognostic value of clinical markers, CCTA, Rb PET, 15O-water PET, CT-FFR and QFR(Follow-up: Myocardial infarction and mortality rates after 3+5+10 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验