Does Use of Rapid Response EEG Impact Clinical Decision Making
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 164
- 试验地点
- 5
- 主要终点
- Change in physicians' diagnosis decision
研究概览
简要总结
This study is designed as a prospective, non-randomized, observational, multicenter clinical trial. The primary aim of this study is to observe if the use of the rapid responds electroencephalography (EEG) system impacts physician decision making. Secondary aims include exploring the safety and performance information of the Ceribell EEG system compared to conventional EEG system. The study will recruit physicians (Faculty physicians and Trainees) at up to five institutions and examine the impact of rapid response EEG when providing care to patients in whom EEG recording has been ordered for clinical reasons.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients undergoing clinically ordered EEGs.
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Change in physicians' diagnosis decision
时间窗: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Physician will record their diagnostic assessment of seizure in Yes or No.
Change in physicians' diagnosis confidence
时间窗: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Physician will rate their diagnosis confidence with a score between 1 to 5
Change in physicians' treatment decision
时间窗: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Physician will record their treatment decision in Yes or No.
Change in physicians' treatment confidence
时间窗: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Physician will rate their treatment confidence with a score between 1 to 5
次要结局
- Time from order to EEG arrival(through study completion, an average of 1 year)
- Set up time(through study completion, an average of 1 year)
- Ease of use(through study completion, an average of 1 year)
- Signal Quality of EEG(through study completion, an average of 1 year)