Comparison of a Computerized Image Analysis to Conventional Airway Examination Techniques to Predict Difficult Endotracheal Intubation

Both control and experimental cohorts will be recruited in this study. In order to drive clinical acceptance of this technique, the investigators will need to study and then demonstrate applicability to all patients regardless of race or gender. This will require the recruitment of a control population of patients who have been demonstrated at surgery to be easy to intubate. Such patients are in relative abundance. The experimental group will consist of patients who are found at surgery to be difficult to intubate. In addition, a prospective cohort will be recruited without prior knowledge of ease or difficulty of intubation, and subsequent ground truth determined at surgery. Patients are defined as easy to intubate if their anesthetic record described a single attempt with a Macintosh 3 blade resulting in a grade 1 laryngoscopic view (full exposure of the vocal cords). Difficult intubation was defined by at least one of: more than one attempt by an operator with at least one year of anesthesia experience, grade 3 or 4 laryngoscopic view on a 4 point scale, 5 need for a second operator, or non-elective use of an alternative airway device such as a bougie, fiberoptic bronchoscope or intubating laryngeal mask airway.

The primary purpose of the study is to develop algorithms capable of discriminating patients who are likely to be difficult to intubate from those who are likely to be easy to intubate based on facial appearance. The primary analysis is the demonstration of statistical significance in the ability of the derived algorithms to determine successfully whether a subject was easy or difficult to intubate. A secondary analysis is the demonstration of a statistical difference in performance between the derived algorithms versus conventional airway assessment tests.

An ongoing modification of the protocol will allow anesthesia personnel to attempt intubation with a Miller (straight) laryngoscope blade, instead of a Macintosh blade. This secondary outcome was chosen because of the strong preference, and in some cases, better skill, with such a blade. It is possible that different facial features will predict difficulty with this blade than has been predicted to date with a Macintosh blade.