Comparison of Surgical Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome with Corticosteroid Injection and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 68
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Visual Analog Scale
研究概览
简要总结
This prospective randomized controlled study included 68 patients (aged 18-70) with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), randomized into three groups: surgical treatment (25 patients, 25 wrists), corticosteroid (CS) treatment (20 patients, 32 wrists), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment (23 patients, 35 wrists). Diagnosis was confirmed through clinical evaluation and electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing, with assessments including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), ultrasonographic median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) and flattening ratio (FR), and sensory/motor conduction parameters. Treatments were ultrasound-guided CS (1 mL triamcinolone, 40 mg/mL) or PRP (1 mL extracted from centrifuged venous blood) injections, while surgical treatment involved standard open carpal tunnel release using the WALANT (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet) technique. Follow-ups were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months, and the study was ethically approved with informed patient consent.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 70 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •minimum of 3 months duration of symptoms and mild to moderate CTS
排除标准
- •Patients with severe CTS diagnosed with EMG or the presence of thenar atrophy, 2) Polyneuropathy, 3) Previous injection therapy for CTS, 4) Previous CTS surgery, 5) Pregnancy or lactation.
研究组 & 干预措施
surgery group
干预措施: open carpal tunnel surgery (Procedure)
steroid injection group
干预措施: Steroid Injection (Procedure)
prp injection group
干预措施: PRP injection (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Visual Analog Scale
时间窗: 1-3-6 months
Electrophysiological studies
时间窗: 1-3-6 months
All EDX were performed using the Medtronic Key-Point EMG device (Denmark) by a neurology expert. Sensory and motor conduction studies of the median nerve and sensory conduction studies of the ulnar nerve were performed using standard techniques of supramaximal stimulation. Stimulation intensity was increased (3 mA for sensory or motor studies) each time until supramaximal stimulation was reached and maximal action potential was achieved. Sensory nerve conduction studies were performed with an antidromic method. Median nerve sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude were calculated by recording from thumb and ulnar nerve from the 5th finger. Median nerve compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude and distal motor latency (DML) were recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis Comparing with our clinical neurophysiology laboratory's normal values, the patients with only abnormal SNCVs (small or slow) with normal motor conduction we
ultrasonography
时间窗: 1-3-6 months
In both measurements and injections, the patients were positioned as follows: shoulder in a neutral position, elbow at 90º flexion, forearm supinated, wrist in slight extension, and fingers in semi-flexion. For examination, a linear array probe portable US device (Clarius, L7 HD3 Linear Scanner) was used. Median nerve CSA was measured using the manual trace method in axial view in the proximal carpal tunnel (at the scaphoid-pisiform level), where the median nerve's largest enlargement was found. The mean of cross-sectional area (CSA) was calculated using three consecutive measurements (mm²) and recorded. Flattening ratio (FR) was calculated by dividing the transverse diameter of the nerve by its anteroposterior diameter.
Boston carpal tunnel Questionnaire
时间窗: 1-3-6 months
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Yusuf Kıratlıoğlu
ankara university
Ankara University