Randomized Assessment of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Post-TAVR Patients With Persistent High-Degree Atrioventricular Block or Complete Heart Block Requiring Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 430
- 主要终点
- CV Mortality and Heart Failure Events
研究概览
简要总结
The RAFT-TAVR PACE study is a clinical trial designed to compare two types of heart pacing methods in patients who develop conduction problems after undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure.
This study will evaluate whether Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP), a newer and more natural pacing method, is better than the traditional Right Ventricular Pacing (RVP) at improving heart function and patient outcomes.
The study aims to recruit 60 patients across six centers and will focus on the safety, feasibility, and success of LBBAP compared to RVP. Patients will be followed for one year to assess heart function, quality of life, and any complications related to the pacing method.
详细描述
The RAFT-TAVR PACE study is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) and Right Ventricular Pacing (RVP) in patients who develop persistent high-degree atrioventricular block (HDAVB) or complete heart block (CHB) following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR).
Background & Rationale:
TAVR is an established treatment for severe aortic stenosis, but conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) remain a common complication, affecting approximately 15-25% of patients post-TAVR. Conventional RVP has been associated with ventricular dyssynchrony, adverse cardiac remodeling, and increased risk of heart failure.
LBBAP is an emerging conduction system pacing technique that may preserve physiological ventricular activation by engaging the His-Purkinje system more effectively. While observational studies suggest LBBAP may improve ventricular function, quality of life, and clinical outcomes compared to RVP, no large-scale RCT has yet validated these benefits in post-TAVR patients requiring PPI.
Study Objectives:
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Successful insertion of TAVR for aortic stenosis
- •Persistent HDAVB or CHB identified within 30 days of TAVR
- •● HDAVB is defined as any of the following(9): Second-degree AV block type 2 (Mobitz II) in the presence of a QRS ≥120 msec, or 2:1 AV block in the presence of a QRS ≥120 msec, or ≥2 consecutive P waves at a constant physiologic rate that do not conduct to the ventricles, or transient third-degree AV block, or in the setting of AF a prolonged pause (>3 s) or a fixed slow (<50 beats/min) ventricular response rate.
- •Age ≥ 18 years
排除标准
- •Patients with a pacemaker/ICD/CRT prior to TAVR
- •More than mild para-valvular regurgitation following TAVR
- •Patients with clinical indication for CRT-D or CRT-P
- •Patients with mechanical tricuspid valve
- •Renal failure - eGFR<15 or on dialysis
- •Un-revascularized coronary artery disease with proximal multi-vascular coronary disease
- •Acute coronary syndrome with 3 months
- •Cardiogenic shock requiring inotropic therapy within 1 week
- •Life-expectancy < 2 years
- •Anticipating heart transplant within 1 year
- •Pregnant or intending to become pregnant within the study period
- •Participating in another randomized controlled trial
- •Unable or unwilling to provide consent
研究组 & 干预措施
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) Group
Participants randomized to receive Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). This pacing technique aims to preserve physiologic ventricular activation by directly pacing the left bundle branch area.
干预措施: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (Procedure)
Right Ventricular Pacing (RVP) Group
Participants randomized to receive Right Ventricular Pacing (RVP) after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). This technique is the traditional pacing method, which stimulates the right ventricle to maintain cardiac rhythm.
干预措施: Right Ventricular Pacing (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
CV Mortality and Heart Failure Events
时间窗: from enrollment to the 12 month FU at minimum, with data collected every 6 months after until study completion at 5 year mark
The primary outcome of the full-scale RCT is a composite of CV mortality and HF events. All deaths and in-patient/outpatient unscheduled encounters will be adjudicated by a clinical events adjudication committee. HF events are defined as an admission to a healthcare facility for \>24 hours with a diagnosis of worsening HF or worsening HF requiring intravenous HF therapy and ultrafiltration at an urgent or outpatient healthcare facility. The rationale for using CV mortality and HF events as the primary outcome is that pacing therapy will not prevent non-CV deaths. The rationale for including the worsening of HF managed in outpatient facilities is that more patients are managed aggressively with IV diuretics in emergency departments, HF clinics, and infusion centers, avoiding hospitalization. This is accepted by Health Canada, US Food and Drug Administration, and European Medicines Agency.
Successful Enrollment and Randomization
时间窗: from start of enrollment to end of vanguard/pilot phase of study, enrolling 60 patients
(1) Successfully enroll and randomize 60 patients in 9 months from 6 participating centers
VANGUARD - Successful implantation of devices
时间窗: Vanguard phase - from enrollment to the 60th patient being enrolled and followed up at 12 month FU point
(2) Successfully implant the devices in 60 randomized patients, defined as \<10% inability to implant LBBAP lead in those randomized to have LBBAP
VANGUARD - at least 90% ventricular pace at 3 months follow up
时间窗: enrollment to 3 month FU timepoint
\>90% ventricular pace in these 60 patients at 3 months follow-up
次要结局
- CV Mortality(at least 12 months until 4 years when the study is complete and all data is collected for the last participant)
- Heart Failure Events(minimum 1 year to end of study completion, average of 5 years)
- Quality of Life Assessment Change(enrollment to end of study completion, an average of 5 years)
- Change of NT-proBNP(1 year)
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)(1 year)
- Quality of Life Assessment Change - EQ5D(from baseline enrollment to end of study, average of 5 years)
研究者
Habib Khan
Dr. Habib Khan, Co-Principal Investigator
London Health Sciences Centre
