A Safety Planning Intervention and Follow-up Telehealth Service Model for Suicidal Individuals in Emergency Department Settings
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- Enrolling By Invitation
- 入组人数
- 2,814
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Outpatient Treatment Engagement - Count
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a suicide prevention strategy delivered via telehealth in Emergency Departments. We will compare implementation of the Safety Planning Intervention plus follow-up calls (SPI+) delivered by Emergency Department (ED) staff to SPI+ delivered via ED referral to an off-site Suicide Prevention Consultation Center (SPCC).
详细描述
Individuals at high risk for suicide often present to acute care settings, such as emergency departments (EDs), and then typically are hospitalized or referred for outpatient mental health treatment. Patients are at increased risk of suicide attempts and suicide following an ED visit and nearly half do not attend outpatient treatment. Brief, evidence-based clinical interventions, such as the Safety Planning Intervention with post-discharge telephone follow-up (SPI+), can reduce suicide risk, decrease hospitalizations, and increase engagement in outpatient services for suicidal patients discharged from the ED. Leveraging insights from implementation science and collaborative care, we propose a model in which ED staff will connect patients at risk for suicide to ED-credentialed mental health clinicians who are located external to the ED. These off-site clinicians will provide SPI+ via telehealth for ED patients prior to discharge and provide follow-up services after ED discharge as part of an innovative Suicide Prevention Consultation Center (SPCC). All participating EDs will begin in the Enhanced Usual Care phase, in which ED staff will deliver SPI+ to suicidal patients. EDs will then be randomized in pairs to begin referral to the SPCC in 3 month intervals. We will also conduct a cost evaluation to help determine scalability and sustainability.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Aim 1/Aim 3:
- •Inclusion Criteria:
- •ED visit at one of our participating sites for a suicide-related event or determined to be at risk for suicide per the Electronic Health Record (EHR) and ED clinical staff
- •18 years of age or older
- •Not admitted to an inpatient hospital following the index ED visit as documented in the EHR
排除标准
- •- Inpatient admission following the index ED visit per the EHR
- •Inclusion Criteria:
- •ED clinician or leader at one of our participating sites, or ED patient who was referred to the SPCC
- •18 years of age or older
- •Able to communicate in English
- •Willing to give informed consent
- •Exclusion Criteria:
- •Patients who are at imminent risk of suicide or acutely psychotic at the time of the interview, requiring emergency services and/or precluding ability to provide informed consent
- •Patients without a phone for contact
研究组 & 干预措施
Suicide Prevention Consultation Center
ED staff refer suicidal patients not admitted to an inpatient unit to the off-site Suicide Prevention Consultation Center (SPCC). SPCC clinicians will deliver SPI+ (Safety Planning Intervention plus 2 or more post-discharge telephone calls) to patients via telehealth.
干预措施: SPI+ Delivered by SPCC Clinicians (Behavioral)
Enhanced Usual Care
ED staff deliver SPI+ (Safety Planning Intervention plus 2 or more post-discharge telephone calls) to suicidal patients who are not admitted to an inpatient unit.
干预措施: SPI+ Delivered by ED Staff (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Outpatient Treatment Engagement - Count
时间窗: 6 months after index ED visit
Number of behavioral healthcare visits following discharge from index ED visit
Reach/Penetration of Safety Plans
时间窗: At index ED visit
Proportion of patients with a completed safety plan documented in the medical record out of all patients identified as at risk for suicide by the ED staff
Outpatient Treatment Engagement - Type
时间窗: 6 months after index ED visit
Types of behavioral healthcare visits following discharge from index ED visit
Reach/Penetration of Follow-up Calls
时间窗: 1 month after index ED visit
Proportion of patients who receive 2 or more telephone follow-up attempts out of all patients who received a safety plan
Suicide Behavior Composite
时间窗: 6 months after index ED visit
Number of patients who had a documented suicide attempt or death by suicide
Safety Planning Intervention Scoring Algorithm (SPISA)
时间窗: At index ED visit
Fidelity of written safety plans post-discharge from index ED visit
Fidelity of Follow-up Calls
时间窗: 1 month after index ED visit
Number of patients who had 2 or more follow-up calls post-discharge from index ED visit
次要结局
- Feasibility of SPCC(9-12 months after ED crosses over to SPCC condition)
- Acceptability of SPCC(9-12 months after ED crosses over to SPCC condition)
- Cost to Emergency Department of SPCC(After ED crosses over to SPCC condition (2.25 - 3 year range, average of 2.625 years))
- Cost to Emergency Department of EUC(Before ED crosses over to SPC condition (1 - 1.75 year range, average of 1.375 years))
- Suicide-related ED Visits and Psychiatric Hospitalizations(6 months after index ED visit)
- Suicide Attempts(6 months after index ED visit)
- Adoption(At index ED visit)
- Utilization of Screening of Suicide Risk Among ED Patients(At index ED visit)
- Index ED Visit Inpatient Admission Disposition(At index ED visit)
