The Effectiveness of RAPID-Based Psychological First Aid Training: A Single-Group Pre-Test-Post-Test Follow-up Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 10
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Interpersonal Communication Competency
研究概览
简要总结
This study uses a single-group pre-test-post-test follow-up design. The aim is to evaluate participants' interpersonal communication competencies and active-empathetic listening skills before and after psychological first aid training.
详细描述
Psychological First Aid (PFA) is an evidence-based, early intervention designed to reduce initial distress and support short- and long-term adaptive functioning following traumatic events or disasters. PFA is not a formal therapy, but rather a set of supportive actions that can be implemented by both professionals and trained individuals to stabilize and support affected people. PFA can be applied to individuals of all ages and groups by those who have received training. PFA training is offered through various models, including the World Health Organization's "Look, Listen, Connect" approach, the Johns Hopkins RAPID-PFA model, and competency-based frameworks. The RAPID model helps intervention teams provide immediate, compassionate, and practical support to those affected by trauma or disasters. RAPID is an acronym representing five core steps: Rapport & Reflective Listening, Assessment, Prioritization, Intervention, Disposition.
The PFA training designed in this study is based on the RAPID model, a fundamental model. This study aimed to evaluate and monitor the effects of online PFA training, which utilized RAPID-based theoretical presentations, case analyses, scenarios, videos on communication sequences, role-playing, exercises (relaxation exercises, grounding, etc.), feedback, quizzes, and discussion teaching methods, on nurses' interpersonal communication competencies and active-empathetic listening skills. The sample consisted of individuals who participated in the "Psychological First Aid Training Course" given by the researcher and volunteered to participate in the study. Purposive sampling was used as the sampling method. This method was chosen because the sample would consist of course participants. When administering the tests and follow-up tests, participants were asked to give themselves a nickname and use these names in the tests. PHA training was planned as a six-week, six-module online program with two lessons per module, totaling 12 hours. In the first session of the training, pre-tests (Interpersonal Communication Competency Inventory, Active-Empathic Listening Scale) were administered to the participants who volunteered to participate in the research. A final test was administered at the end of the six-week training. A follow-up test will be administered three months after the completion of the training.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Completion of the PIY Training Course,
- •Being able to understand and respond to what is read,
- •Giving consent to participate in the study.
排除标准
- •Not having more than one absence from course sessions despite being registered for the training.
研究组 & 干预措施
Intervention group
group that received psychological first aid training
干预措施: RAPID-based psychological first aid training (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Interpersonal Communication Competency
时间窗: Baseline
Listening Skills, Social Comfort Skills, Empathy Skills, Expression Skills. It consists of 15 items. The scale is a five-point Likert type. The scale can be scored from a minimum of 15 to a maximum of 75. Higher scores indicate a higher level of interpersonal communication competence. In the original version of the scale, the Cronbach's Alpha value was reported as 0.84; in the Turkish version, it was reported as 0.75.
Active-Empathic Listening
时间窗: Baseline
Perception, processing, and response skills.The scale consists of 11 items divided into three sub-dimensions. There are no items that can be reverse-scored on the scale. The lowest possible score is 11, while the highest is 77. Higher scores on the scale indicate that the participant has a high level of skill in the specified dimension. High scores on the scale indicate that the participant has a high level of skill in the specified dimension.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Melisa BULUT
assistant professor
Abant Izzet Baysal University
