跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04255654
NCT04255654已完成不适用

A Brief Intervention for Food Insecurity in Dietetic Practice

Coventry University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 52 人开始时间: 2019年8月28日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
52
试验地点
2
主要终点
Feasibility of the intervention

研究概览

简要总结

1 in 10 people in the UK cannot afford enough nutritious food to eat, to help them and their family stay healthy.

We aim to find out what it would be like for both dietitians and their clients to be asked, routinely in a dietetic appointment, about having enough food to eat. Your dietitian will ask you 2 questions about your access to food and, if you want, they will discuss some options which might be helpful for you if your access to food is limited. Some of the discussions that take place (regarding the intervention only) will be audio recorded with your consent to check they are being done correctly.

If options which might be helpful for you to get more access to food were required you will then be asked to take part in a telephone interview, which will be audio recorded and will involve discussing your experience of the intervention and what you did with the information provided. After this telephone interview, this will be the end of the study for you.

详细描述

Background:

Food insecurity is an international priority. This global issue is affecting developing and developed countries (FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO 2018). 1 in 10 people within the UK are experiencing food insecurity (Taylor and Loopstra 2016). The prevalence of food insecurity is projected to increase due to continual cuts in the welfare state and introduction of universal credit. A study conducted by the United Nations looking at the food insecurity landscape in the UK identified 8.4million individuals (13%) were food insecure in 2014 (Taylor and Loopstra 2016). In comparison to other European countries the UK has the 11th highest prevalence of food insecurity (10.1%) out of 28 European countries. Put simply food insecurity is not having physical access to enough nutritious food to eat well for good health. When food becomes scarce, hygiene, safety and nutrition are often ignored as people shift to less nutritious diets and consume more 'unsafe foods' (WHO 2018). The United States Department of Agriculture (2018) use the definition of food insecurity provided by Anderson (1990) 'the limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods or limited or uncertain ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways'.

Food insecurity can lead to negative health and wellbeing outcomes (Gunderson and Ziliak 2015). For example, those children who are identified as food insecure are more likely to have asthma, behavioural problems and worse oral health. Mothers who are food insecure are twice as likely to report mental health problems. Diabetic adults who are food insecure are more likely to have poorer health outcomes due to the impact food insecurity can have on adherence to medical recommendations such as following a healthy diet for diabetes management (Gunderson and Ziliak 2015). New ways of tackling the increased socio-economic and health burden of food insecurity needs to be considered. Identifying and acting on food insecurity is fundamental for health professionals working in clinical practice.

Dietitians are best placed to discuss food insecurity as their consultations are focused on diet, food and nutrition, however food insecurity is not routinely discussed or screened for in UK dietetic practice. Dietetic consultations in the UK are increasingly more holistic and brief interventions to make every contact count regarding smoking cessation and physical activity are being promoted. Making every contact count refers to the opportunity every health care professional has to raise health promoting issues irrespective of the reason for the consultation (Health Education England 2018). Commonly mood, physical activity, alcohol intake and smoking status can be raised in a consultation as part of the making every contact count initiative. The evidence around brief interventions being conducted by a variety of healthcare professionals, for several health behaviours, is growing (Lewis et al. 2013). These interventions use the 3 A's approach (ask, advise and act) and should only take a moment of a consultation time.

In the US, Canada and Australia screening for food insecurity is already happening in some areas of clinical practice. The American Academy of Paediatrics released a policy statement in October 2015 that recommends all paediatricians screen all children for food insecurity. The policy statement identifies the short and long term adverse health impacts of food insecurity and recommends the referral to community resources (The American Academy of Paediatrics 2015). There is also emerging evidence in adult care that screening for food insecurity in diabetes and HIV care can have positive outcomes on treatment and now forms part of usual practice (Thomas et al. 2017 and Young et al. 2008).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Attending dietitian clinic
  • Is ≥18 years of age or their main care giver is ≥18 years of age
  • Is willing and able to provide informed consent to participate and comply with the study procedures
  • Is able to understand English

排除标准

  • The dietitian deems it inappropriate to make an opportunistic brief intervention on food insecurity. This includes personal and medical reasons known to the dietitian or reasons related to the consultation (for example the dietitian service user has become distressed and it would seem insensitive to complete the intervention at that time).
  • Is <18 years of age and their main care giver is <18 years of age
  • No interpreter present, therefore the potential participant is unable to understand and speak English sufficiently to give informed consent
  • Lacks capacity to give informed consent.
  • Has a diagnosed severe eating disorder

结局指标

主要结局

Feasibility of the intervention

时间窗: 6 months

Feasibility is to be measured by the number of dietetic service users consenting to take part, the number of completed brief interventions and the number of dietetic service users identified with food insecurity.

次要结局

  • Dietitian Acceptability(6 months)
  • Dietitian User Acceptability(6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Deborah Lycett

Professor in Religious Health Interventions & Dietetic Practice

Coventry University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验