跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07293936
NCT07293936招募中不适用

Validation of a Post-Filter Hematocrit Calculation Formula: A Comparative Analysis With Measured Post-Filter Hematocrit Values

Gwyndolyn M. Radford2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2025年3月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
20
试验地点
2
主要终点
Agreement between measured and calculated post-filter hematocrit values.

研究概览

简要总结

Filter clotting is a major complication of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), resulting in blood loss, reduced treatment efficacy, and increased cost. One modifiable factor associated with filter clotting is filtration fraction (FF), or the proportion of plasma water being removed from the blood over the course of the filter. In convention, a cutoff of FF<20-30% has been used to prevent hemofilter clotting, but no evidence correlating FF with hemofilter clotting has been documented. Some experts have proposed that post-filter hematocrit (Hct) could be a more direct marker for determining hemofilter clotting risk, but evidence supporting clinical utility of this marker is lacking.

HCTpost=HCTpre/(FF(HCTpre-1)+1)

In our proposed validation study, we hope to determine whether our formula for post-filter Hct provides accurate results when compared to measured values. The information obtained from this study will potentially justify the use of utilizing the formula in future studies.

The procedure of this study is collecting blood samples from the post-filter lines of patients on CRRT at different time points and different flow rates. This will be considered the "measured post-filter hematocrit" which will then be compared to the calculated formula above, using the other values obtained from daily labs (for pre-filter hematocrit) and CRRT machine settings.

详细描述

This investigational study is listed as "other" because it is a validation study comparing two measurement methods-comparing a calculated versus a machine-measured post-filter hematocrit- and is typically classified as a cross-sectional investigational study in the context of diagnostic or method comparison research.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients initiated on CRRT age equal than or greater to 18 years of age

排除标准

  • patients on ECMO

结局指标

主要结局

Agreement between measured and calculated post-filter hematocrit values.

时间窗: Participation begins at consent and includes a single study procedure in which four post-filter blood samples are collected over ~40 minutes. Participation ends after the final draw. Generally, no longer than 1 day.

Use Bland-Altman analysis to assess agreement and quantify bias and limits of agreement. Calculate correlation coefficients (Pearson or Spearman) to evaluate the strength of association.

次要结局

  • Analyze the impact of CRRT settings on discrepancies between measured and calculated Filtration Fraction(Participation begins at consent and includes a single study procedure in which four post-filter blood samples are collected over ~40 minutes. Participation ends after the final draw. Generally, no longer than one day.)
  • Subgroup analysis based on patient-specific factors(Participation begins at consent and includes a single study procedure in which four post-filter blood samples are collected over ~40 minutes. Participation ends after the final draw.)

研究者

发起方
Gwyndolyn M. Radford
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Gwyndolyn M. Radford

Principal Investigator

University of Iowa

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验