跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04427670
NCT04427670已完成不适用

Implementation and Feasibility Study of Group Intervention for Individuals with Dysarthria Following Stroke and Their Carers in Pakistan

Isra University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2020年12月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Efficacy of group intervention for Patients With Dysarthria will be assessed by the translated version of Communicative Participation Item Bank.

研究概览

简要总结

Dysarthria is a common problem in Pakistan. therefore the current study aims to translate the dysarthria communication tools into urdu language for better understanding the population and the problem

详细描述

Dysarthria is the inefficiency or restricted capability to form intelligible speech because of the inability of motor control on the speech structures. There are many therapeutic approaches in Pakistan that are in use for the patients with dysarthria following stroke. One of them is one to one intervention which may include one dysarthria client along with the speech therapist. The therapist delivers step by step instructions to the client. The essential assessments are being held to initiate the treatment. The application of this intervention approach leaves some drawbacks, such as, the patients find it difficult to relate and adapt to the treatment offered. Generalization also seems to be complicated. The patients express a lack in motivation and support. The other mode of approach is group intervention, in which multiple dysarthria clients along with their caregivers & speech therapist are included. In the later one, there are greater chances of recovery for patients as they get peer support and build confidence through newfound friends, peer communication with realistic social setting, learning through teaching, increased awareness of skills and it is time constraints. The culture of practicing group sessions with dysarthria patients is lacked in Pakistan, which intends to meet and compensate for all the drawbacks and lacks of one on one intervention. By including the Dysarthria patients, therapist and the caregivers in the group intervention, there're greater chances of reduced anxiety for both patients & caregivers regarding disorder & its recovery.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 40 to 70 years age ranges
  • History of dysarthria previous six monthes
  • Primary level of education
  • Functional hearing and visual ablities -

排除标准

  • Patient with age below 40 to 70
  • Patients with diagnosis severe psychological illness
  • Patient with developmental dysarthria
  • Patient who come alone without any attendent

结局指标

主要结局

Efficacy of group intervention for Patients With Dysarthria will be assessed by the translated version of Communicative Participation Item Bank.

时间窗: 6 months

Communicative Participation Item Bank is four point scale arranging from 0 to 3 where 0 for better communication participation and 3 for worst communication participation.

Efficacy of group intervention for Patients With Dysarthria will be assessed by Gernal Health Questionnaire

时间窗: 6 months

Gernal Health Questionnaire is four point scale in which responses 1 means better and 4 for worst condition

efficacy of group intervention for Patients With Dysarthria will be assessed by the translated version of Roberston Dysarthria Profile.

时间窗: 6 months

Roberston Dysarthria Profile take responses on 5 point likert scale where 1 for worst and 5 for better outcome.

Efficacy of group intervention for Patients With Dysarthria will be assessed by Speech Intelligiblity Test

时间窗: 6 months

Speech Intelligiblity Test is three point scale where 2 stands for correct utterances and 0 shows wrong production of sounds.

efficacy of group intervention for Patients With Dysarthria will be assessed by translated version of Communication Effectivness Measure

时间窗: 6 months

Communication Effectivness Measure is seven point scale arranging from 1 to 7 where 1 for worst outcome and 7 for better outcome.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Saima maratab

principle investigator

Isra University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验