跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06980571
NCT06980571已完成不适用

Randomised Prospective Study of CUSA Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Technique in Liver Resections

Barts & The London NHS Trust1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2006年6月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Blood loss per cm squared of liver parenchyma cut through

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a particular method of operating on the liver is superior to the "gold" standard commonest technique. CUSA (ultrasonic agitation) will be compared to the newer heat coagulation technique (radiofrequency ablation) and comparisons of blood loss, transfusion requirements, complication rates, hospital stay, effect on liver function, health economics and death rate will be made. The groups will be assessed for comparability in terms of underlying disease, resection type, underlying concurrent illnesses, sex, age, background liver disease. Standardisations of the rest of the operation will be carried out including anaesthetic technique and fluid requirements will be assessed by oesophageal Doppler. 100 patients will be recruited.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •any adult patient listed for liver resection giving informed consent

排除标准

  • •children, non-consent and diminished responsibility

研究组 & 干预措施

Radiofrequency ablation

Active Comparator

50 patients randomised to radiofrequency ablation technique of liver resection

干预措施: radiofrequency ablation (Device)

CUSA

No Intervention

50 patients having liver resection randomised to CUSA

结局指标

主要结局

Blood loss per cm squared of liver parenchyma cut through

时间窗: operation date until three months from discharge

次要结局

  • mortality(inpatient and thirty day mortality)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验