The Accuracy of Static Computer-aided Implant Surgery Compared With Conventional Laboratory-guided Implant Surgery for Single-tooth Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 40
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- The accuracy of implant placement
研究概览
简要总结
To compare the static computer-aided implant surgery (s-CAIS) and conventional laboratory-guided implant surgery (c-LIS) in terms of accuracy for single tooth replacement in posterior areas.
详细描述
There was still a lack of evidence in randomized clinical studies about the accuracy measurement comparing digital and laboratory workflows with tooth-supported templates for single implant cases in the posterior regions. Therefore, this present study's primary investigation was to perform accuracy measurement comparing digital and laboratory workflows with tooth-supported templates for single implant cases in the posterior regions. The secondary investigation was to find the effect of several factors on the accuracy of implant placement in these areas.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 25 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Patients had a partially edentulous ridge in the premolar-molar region with existing two-sided interproximal as well as antagonistic contacts
- •Patients had healthy periodontal status and adequate keratinized gingiva at the edentulous space
排除标准
- •- Patients have any local and systemic diseases considered as contraindications for dental implant treatment.
结局指标
主要结局
The accuracy of implant placement
时间窗: Three months after implant placement
Patients were called back to record the actual implant position with the the intraoral scanner (Trios 3, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). The surface scans were then exported as an STL file and were imported to coDiagnostiX software. Those postoperative surface scans were merged with the preoperative surface scan in each group protocols. The "Treatment evaluation tool" function tool was used to measure the accuracy of the implant placement which measured the amount of deviation of the placed implant from the planned position. The outcomes were generated into three main parameters which were Angular deviation, Coronal global deviation and Apical global deviation. Angular deviation = the amount of angle(°), in which the actually placed implant deviated from the virtually planned implant in 3D. Coronal/ Apical global deviation = the amount of distance(mm), in which the actually placed implant deviated from the virtually planned implant at the coronal/ apical position in 3D.
次要结局
- Factors influencing the accuracy of implant placement(Three months after implant placement)