跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01792219
NCT01792219Unknown不适用

The Effectiveness of Learning to Collaborate Interprofessionally on Healthcare Processes and Outcomes in Nursing Homes: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care.

Universiteit Antwerpen0 个研究点目标入组 1,000 人开始时间: 2013年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
1,000
主要终点
Number of fallers in nursing homes and number of recurrent fallers

研究概览

简要总结

Title: The effectiveness of learning to collaborate interprofessionally on healthcare processes and outcomes in nursing homes: a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care.

The ageing of the population is expected to be a major driver of increasing demand for more complex and continuous care. The delivery of health care for this population requires high level of coordinated teamwork and efforts. Interprofessional collaboration can improve healthcare processes and outcomes. It assumes a model of working together. It is a process by which professionals develop an integrated and cohesive answer to the needs of the patients. In this study the possible effects of learning to interprofessionally collaborate will be investigated on health care processes and outcomes for chronic geriatric patients in nursing homes.

详细描述

  1. Introduction

The extent to which different health care professionals work together can affect the quality of the health care that they provide. Government bodies and organizations of different medical and paramedical professions emphasize the importance of interprofessional collaboration in health care (IPCIHC). It assumes a model of working together particular with attention for the process by which professionals develop an integrated and cohesive answer to the needs of the client/family/population. The outcome is rather difficult to be evaluated and therefore it is important to understand the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving IPCIHC and so improving quality of care.

Despite the large number of publications on interprofessional collaboration, a higher quality of research, evidence and more rigorous evaluation is needed to support decision makers. It is especially required to be specific when conclusions for certain population and context should be drawn. The ageing of the population is expected to be a major driver of increasing demand for long-term care services. Delivery of health care for this population requires high levels of coordinated teamwork and efforts to provide a good quality of care. But what is quality of care? To assess 'quality of care' it first has to be defined and that depends on whether one assesses only the performance of practitioners or also the contribution of patients and the health care system. As described by the American Medical Association, quality of care is "care that consistently contributes to the improvement or maintenance of quality and/or duration of life". Donabedian conceptualized quality of care as having an inter-related structure, process and outcome components. Structured such as for example 'staffing', process as actions on the patients such as for example restraint. And outcome indicators assess patient's end result such as for example falls.

Interprofessional collaboration as an intervention seems to result in a positive effect for health care outcomes. Nevertheless there is need for more concrete information on effect of interprofessional collaboration for chronic geriatric patients. Overall the positive effect of interprofessional collaboration as an intervention for chronic geriatric care is mainly found for outcomes such as fall incidence, transition, quality of life, medication change and costs. 2. Research question What are the effects of learning to collaborate according an interprofessional model on healthcare processes and outcomes for chronic geriatric patients in nursing homes? 3. Study objectives

3.1 Primary objective To investigate the effectiveness of learning to interprofessional collaborate on quality indicators of 'care and safety' (fall incidence, medication, hospital visits) and on quality indicators of 'caregivers and care organization' (absenteeism).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
65 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Nursing homes are eligible for participating when the residents meet the following criteria
  • •speaking and understanding the Dutch language
  • •living at least ine year in nursing home
  • •Mini-mental state examination of at least 24/30

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

interprofessioal education module

Experimental

an interprofessional education module will be given to learn to collaborate interprofessionally.

干预措施: Interprofessional collaboration in health care module (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Number of fallers in nursing homes and number of recurrent fallers

时间窗: 18 months

Number of medication per day per resident

时间窗: 18 months

Number of different medication per resident

时间窗: 18 months

Number of hospital visits

时间窗: 18 months

Length of stay in hospital

时间窗: 18 months

Number of days absent at work of staff

时间窗: 18 months

Number of absent staff

时间窗: 18 months

次要结局

  • Body weight of residents (in kg)(18 months)
  • Description of restraint policy(18 months)
  • Mortality(18 months)
  • Number of staff participated in training/courses(18 months)
  • Number of volunteers in nursing homes(18 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Giannoula Tsakitzidis

PT, PHD student

Universiteit Antwerpen

相似试验