跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04937257
NCT04937257已完成不适用

Comparison of a Virtual Reality Versus an E-Module on Efficacy of Donning and Doffing PPE: A Randomized Control Trial

Montefiore Medical Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 54 人开始时间: 2020年11月16日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
54
试验地点
2
主要终点
Overall Donning and Doffing Performance

研究概览

简要总结

All front-line healthcare workers in the United States must receive PPE training but there is no gold standard for doing so(1). Training methods vary, with the conventional approaches being in-person or video presentations (2). In-person, hands-on training tends to be preferred, however staff shortages limit feasibility and contamination still occurs (2-4). Online modules and videos are also commonly utilized but pose problems including lack of student engagement, reduced accountability, and the limitations of teaching hands-on skills online (5,6). Nonetheless, immersive methods with active involvement and feedback have proven superior, but PPE shortages and social distancing guidelines limit their use (2).

Virtual reality (VR) is a potential alternative, offering similar benefits to in-person training, such as immersion and feedback, while minimizing barriers related to timing, social distancing, and equipment shortages(7). Importantly, VR allows for repetitive practice while preserving PPE for clinical interactions. These qualities make VR a viable alternative, although its impact on donning and doffing quality is unknown. Studies regarding PPE training have found in-person and video methods to be comparable and computer simulations to effectively complement in-person training (5, 8, 9). However, to our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the use of VR in PPE training.

The investigators proposed a randomized, blinded intervention-control trial comparing VR versus e-module training in the teaching of donning and doffing PPE in associates and students affiliated with the Montefiore Medical Center.

详细描述

The COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) pandemic highlighted concerns regarding personal protective equipment (PPE) utilization in hospitals (10,11). When used correctly, PPE can prevent COVID-19 infection amongst exposed healthcare workers (12,13) . Evidence suggests that up to 90% of doffing procedures are performed incorrectly (14). This failure rate has been linked to healthcare workers being more likely to contract COVID-19 compared to the general community (15). As a result, authorities have turned to increased training as a potential solution (16).

All front-line healthcare workers in the United States must receive PPE training but there is no gold standard for doing so(1). Training methods vary, with the conventional approaches being in-person or video presentations (2) In-person, hands-on training tends to be preferred, however, staff shortages limit feasibility and contamination still occurs 82% of the time (2-4). Online modules and videos are also commonly utilized but pose problems including lack of student engagement, reduced accountability, and the limitations of teaching hands-on skills online(5,6). Nonetheless, immersive methods with active involvement and feedback have proven superior, but PPE shortages and social distancing guidelines limit their use (2).

Virtual reality (VR) is a potential alternative, offering similar benefits to in-person training, such as immersion and feedback, while minimizing barriers related to timing, social distancing, and equipment shortages(7). Importantly, VR allows for repetitive practice while preserving PPE for clinical interactions. These qualities make VR a viable alternative, although its impact on donning and doffing quality is unknown. Studies regarding PPE training have found in-person and video methods to be comparable and computer simulations to effectively complement in-person training (5, 8, 9). However, to our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the use of VR in PPE training.

The investigators proposed a randomized, blinded intervention-control trial comparing VR versus e-module training in the teaching of donning and doffing PPE in associates and students affiliated with the Montefiore Medical Center.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

The outcome raters were two independent nurse educators, blinded to the study protocol and interventions. An encrypted folder contained outcome videos, each with a unique number, containing no known information that may disclose the study arm.

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Associates affiliated with the Montefiore Medical Center.
  • Medical Students at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Overall Donning and Doffing Performance

时间窗: Immediately after the intervention

Donning and doffing performance was evaluated using a checklist based on Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. The performance checklist consisted of separate sections for donning and doffing. Scoring for each step was based on (1) completion and (2) correct sequence. All points are totaled for a maximum possible score of 64 points and minimum possible score of 0 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

次要结局

  • Participant experience(Baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention)
  • Subgroup analysis(Immediately after the intervention)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Marc J. Gibber

Associate professor

Montefiore Medical Center

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验