跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07394751
NCT07394751进行中(未招募)不适用

Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Materials in Occlusal Restorations: Preliminary Results of a Split-mouth Study

Ege University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2024年11月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
20
试验地点
1
主要终点
FDI-2 evaluation criteria for functional properties

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the performance of three different bioactive restorative materials against a composite resin for a period of 9 months.

This randomized, split-mouth, single-center trial was performed on patients having occlusal caries (ICDAS 3 and 4) in both molars of the same jaw. The restorative materials used were Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill (control, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein), Stela (SDI, Australia), Cention Forte (Ivoclar) and Activa BioActive Restorative (Pulpdent, USA). The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 3-6 and 9-month according to FDI-2 criteria, in terms of functional, biological, and aesthetic parameters, by two experienced evaluators.

详细描述

Objectives: To clinically evaluate the performance of three different bioactive restorative materials against a composite resin for a period of 9 months.

Materials and Methods

This randomized, split-mouth, single-center trial was performed on patients having occlusal caries (ICDAS 3 and 4) in both molars of the same jaw. The restorative materials used were Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill (control, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein), Stela (SDI, Australia), Cention Forte (Ivoclar) and Activa BioActive Restorative (Pulpdent, USA). The material allocation was randomly assigned by a drawing lot. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 3-6 and 9-month according to FDI-2 criteria, in terms of functional, biological, and aesthetic parameters, by two experienced evaluators. Chi-square test was used to compare the variables in the categories. Mann-Whitney U test and paired T test compared the difference in scores for the groups (p<0.05).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 34 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Individuals over the age of 16 with permanent dentition
  • Individuals with a total of four vital molar teeth requiring restoration (ICDAS 3-4), two on each side of the same jaw
  • Individuals with posterior contact with antagonist teeth
  • Individuals who are reliable, cooperative, and willing to participate in periodic follow-ups

排除标准

  • Individuals whose antagonist teeth were missing or have crowns, bridges, etc.
  • Individuals with history of alcohol, drug, or medication addiction.
  • Individuals with pulp exposure during cavity preparation or a cavity depth exceeding 2-4 mm.
  • Individuals known to be unable to attend follow-up appointments.
  • Individuals with allergies to the products used in the procedure.
  • Individuals with severe tooth grinding or bruxism.
  • Individuals with caries conditions classified as ICDAS 5 and
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding individuals and individuals planning pregnancy during the study.

研究组 & 干预措施

Tetric N-Ceram BulkFill

Active Comparator

Tetric N-Ceram Bulkfill application (control group; device 1) was randomly applied to patients.

干预措施: Tetric N Ceram Bulkfill application (Procedure)

Cention Forte

Active Comparator

Cention Forte was randomly applied to patients.

干预措施: Cention Forte application (Procedure)

Stela Automix

Active Comparator

Stela automix was randomly applied to patients.

干预措施: Stela Automix (Procedure)

Activa BioActive Restorative

Active Comparator

Activa BioActive Restorative was randomly applied to patients.

干预措施: Activa BioActive Restorative (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

FDI-2 evaluation criteria for functional properties

时间窗: 2 years

Clinical evaluations were conducted using the FDI-2 criteria by two experienced, calibrated, and blinded evaluators for functional properties (category F). fracture/displacement of the material, marginal adaptation, form and contour, occlusion, and wear) were scored. Scores of 1-3 indicate clinically acceptable and successful restorations, score 4 indicates clinically inadequate but repairable defects, and score 5 represents clinically unacceptable restorations.

次要结局

  • FDI-2 evaluation criteria for biological properties(2 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sebnem Turkun

Prof. Dr.

Ege University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验