跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05793502
NCT05793502招募中不适用

Study on Effectiveness and Safety of LBBaP With Solia S and Selectra 3D Developed by BIOTRONIK

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,000 人开始时间: 2023年7月4日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
1,000
试验地点
1
主要终点
Implantation success rate of LBBaP

研究概览

简要总结

This study is aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of LBBaP with Solia S and Selectra 3D in the Chinese population by analyzing the operation success rate and the system stability during follow-up visits.

详细描述

Traditional ventricular pacing leads are placed in and around the right ventricular apex (RVA), which are easy to operate. The long-term safety and efficacy of right ventricular pacing (RVP) in the treatment of bradycardia arrhythmia have been demonstrated. However, it is shown by CTOPP (Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing) study (1), MOST (Micro-Optical Sectioning Tomography) study (2) and UKPACE (United Kingdom Pacing and Cardiovascular Events) study (3) that long-term and high-proportion right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) may lead to ventricular systolic asynchrony, and accordingly increase the risks of cardiac failure (cardiac insufficiency) and atrial fibrillation (AF).

The concept of His bundle pacing (HBP) has been put forward for a long time, in which His bundle is directly stimulated to synchronously excite the ventricles mainly through the conduction of the His-Purkinje system (HPS) in the electrical activity of the heart. The study performed by Vijayaman et al. (4) shows that HBP can reduce the long-term mortality and the risks of hospitalization for cardiac failure and upgrading to CRT compared with the traditional RVAP. However, HBP surgery has the following disadvantages: (1) It is rather difficult to fix the leads, the operation duration is long, the suture removal duration is long, and the learning curve of doctors is long; (2) The threshold value is high during implantation and may further increase in the long term, and the sensory power is rather low. Therefore, the implantation of spare leads is recommended in relevant guidelines, increasing the hardware burden in patients; (3) The implantation site of patients with conduction block below His bundle is rather difficult or unable to cross the block site.

In order to improve the HBP surgery, Chinese doctors have put forward LBBaP in recent years, arousing widespread concern all over the world. Dedicated sheath tubes and electrode leads are adopted in the technique. Specifically, electrode leads are "screwed" into the left bundle branch area under the left ventricular intima from the right ventricular septum (RVS), and the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is performed to improve bradycardia. Compared with HBP, LBBP has the following advantages: (1) As the implantation site is easier to locate, the operation difficulty is reduced; (2) With a lower and more stable threshold, the sensitivity is better; (3) Distal block is corrected; (4) An enough space is left for atrioventricular junction ablation.

At present, it is collectively known as HBP in the international community. LBBaP refers to conduction system pacing, the performing of which depends on dedicated tools or instruments. In early times, the positioning and fixation of shaping steel wires in combination with active-fixation leads adopted in the technique were realized with the aid of a mapping catheter. The operation success rate of HBP was rather low and LBBaP could not be realized. With the introduction of dedicated sheath tubes by various manufacturers, the operation success rate has been greatly improved. However, there are no enough data derived from large-scale studies at home and abroad on the effectiveness and safety of LBBaP with Selectra 3D and Solia S developed by BIOTRONIK at present.

This study is aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of LBBaP with Solia S and Selectra 3D in the Chinese population by analyzing the operation success rate and the system stability during follow-up visits.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Implantation success rate of LBBaP

时间窗: During the surgery

Implantation success rate of LBBaP

Intraoperatively, the incidence of serious adverse events for devices associated with Solia S and Selectra 3D implantation rate

时间窗: During the surgery

Intraoperatively, the incidence of serious adverse events for devices associated with Solia S and Selectra 3D implantation rate

Occurrence of serious adverse events rate

时间窗: From the time of surgery to the 12-month post-implantation visit

The incidence of serious adverse events associated with permanent pacemaker implantation or cardiac resynchronization from the time of surgery to the 12-month post-implantation visit Incidence of serious adverse events associated with the treatment procedure

次要结局

  • Number of participants with abnormal pacing parameters and abnormal ECG readings(1 month and 12 months post-procedure)
  • Changes of cardiac ultrasound values (including LVEF, LVESD and LVEDD)(12 months post-procedure.)
  • Changes of NYHA class(1 month and 12 months post-procedure)
  • Changes of EQ-5D-5L assessment(1 month and 12 months post-procedure)

研究者

发起方
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Chen Keping

Clinical Professor

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验