跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05109624
NCT05109624已完成不适用

Is Prolonged Period of Prone Position Effective and Safe in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With SARS-COV-2? A Randomized Clinical Trial

Ain Shams University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 52 人开始时间: 2021年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
52
试验地点
2
主要终点
Incidence of complications

研究概览

简要总结

the aim of the study is to assess safety and efficacy of prone position ventilation beyond the usual 16 hrs in patients with SARS-COV-2

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • - American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II- III.
  • Sex (male and females).
  • Age 18 -80 years.
  • Sever adult respiratory distress (ARDS) (defined as a PaO2:FiO2 ratio of <150 mm Hg, with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of ≥0.6, a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) of ≥5 CmH2O, and a tidal volume of 6 ml/Kg of predicted body weight
  • mechanical ventilation for less than 36 hours

排除标准

  • - Contraindication for prone positioning
  • increased intracranial tension.
  • face trauma or surgery.
  • Recent Deep venous thrombosis
  • Unstable spine, femur, or pelvic fractures
  • Mean arterial pressure < 65 mm Hg
  • Pregnant women
  • Pneumothorax
  • Prone positioning before inclusion
  • Those returned to supine position before completing the session time

结局指标

主要结局

Incidence of complications

时间窗: 28 days

Incidence of facial edema, pressure wounds, lines disconnections, hemodynamic instability

rate of successful weaning

时间窗: 28 days

how many patients successfully extubated, hospital survival, ICU stay

次要结局

  • Efficacy of oxygenation(28 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Amr Fouad

lecturer of anesthesia and intensive care

Ain Shams University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Is Prolonged Period of Prone Position Effective and... | 临床试验