Comparative Effectiveness of Elranatamab (PF 06863135) in Clinical Study C1071003 Versus Standard of Care (SOC) in Real-World (RW) External Control Arms in Patients With Triple-Class Refractory (TCR) Multiple Myeloma (MM)
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- Pfizer
- 入组人数
- 508
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Objective Response Rate (ORR)-Unweighted Analysis
研究概览
简要总结
This study is to understand how well elranatamab (PF-06863135) may be used for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Sometimes MM might improve at first, but then gets resistant to the treatment and starts growing again (known as relapsed refractory). This study medicine will be compared with standard-of-care (SOC) therapies used in real-world clinical practice. For people receiving elranatamab, we will use data from the phase 2 clinical trial (MagnetisMM-3). We will also use data from two real-world databases, representing the SOC in clinical practice. This study does not seek any participants for enrollment. We will compare the experiences of people receiving elranatamab to people receiving SOC therapies. This way, it will help us to know how well elranatamab can be used for RRMM treatment.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Aged 18 years and older at index date
- •Diagnosis of MM
- •Measurable disease according to IMWG criteria
- •ECOG performance status ≤2
- •Refractory to at least 1 proteasome inhibitor, 1 immunomodulatory drug, and 1 anti-CD38 treatment (ie, triple-class refractory [TCR])
- •At least 1 treatment following their TCR eligibility
排除标准
- •Acute plasma cell leukemia
- •Amyloidosis
- •Smoldering MM
- •Stem cell transplant within 12 weeks of index or active graft versus host disease (GVHD)
- •Active malignancy within 3 years before index, except for basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ
- •Administration with an investigational drug within 30 days prior to index
研究组 & 干预措施
Elranatamab
Patients treated with elranatamab from the MagnetisMM-3 trial
干预措施: Elranatamab (Drug)
Standard of care
Patients treated with standard-of-care therapies from real-world data sources
干预措施: Standard of care (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Objective Response Rate (ORR)-Unweighted Analysis
时间窗: From index date until first documentation of progression, death, or the start of new anticancer therapy (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
ORR was the percentage of participants with objective response (OR) per IMWG criteria. For the analysis set of participants from Study C1071003 and COTA, OR was partial response (PR) or better (stringent complete response \[sCR\]+complete response \[CR\]+very good partial response \[VGPR\]+PR). For Study C1071003 and Flatiron Health, OR was PR or better (at least VGPR+PR). sCR: CR \& normal serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio \& absence of clonal cells in BMB/BMA by IH, IF, or flow cytometry. CR: negative immunofixation on serum \& urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytoma \& \<5% plasma cells in BMA, if measured by sFLC only, preceding criteria + normal sFLC ratio. VGPR: Serum \& urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis; or \>=90% reduction in serum \& urine M-protein level \<100mg/24h. PR: \>=50% reduction in serum M-protein \& reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90% or \<200 mg/24h. Clopper-Pearson two-sided 95% exact confidence intervals were estimated.
Objective Response Rate-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and COTA Cohort Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW) Analysis
时间窗: From index date until first documentation of progression, death, or the start of new anticancer therapy (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
ORR was the percentage of participants with an OR per IMWG criteria. For the analysis set of participants from Study C1071003 and COTA, the OR was defined as PR or better (sCR + CR + VGPR + PR). For Study C1071003 and Flatiron Health, OR was defined as PR or better (at least VGPR + PR). sCR: CR \& normal serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio \& absence of clonal cells in BMB/BMA by IH, IF, or flow cytometry. CR: negative immunofixation on serum \& urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytoma \& \<5% plasma cells in BMA, if measured by sFLC only, preceding criteria + normal sFLC ratio. VGPR: Serum \& urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis; or \>=90% reduction in serum \& urine M-protein level \<100mg/24h. PR: \>=50% reduction in serum M-protein \& reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90% or \<200 mg/24h. Analysis was performed using IPTW method to balance participant characteristics among reporting groups.
Objective Response Rate-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and Flatiron Health Cohort Using IPTW Analysis
时间窗: From index date until first documentation of progression, death, or the start of new anticancer therapy (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts)
ORR was the percentage of participants with an OR per IMWG criteria. For the analysis set of participants from Study C1071003 and COTA, the OR was defined as PR or better (sCR + CR + VGPR + PR). For Study C1071003 and Flatiron Health, OR was defined as PR or better (at least VGPR + PR). sCR: CR \& normal serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio \& absence of clonal cells in BMB/BMA by IH, IF, or flow cytometry. CR: negative immunofixation on serum \& urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytoma \& \<5% plasma cells in BMA, if measured by sFLC only, preceding criteria + normal sFLC ratio. VGPR: Serum \& urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis; or \>=90% reduction in serum \& urine M-protein level \<100mg/24h. PR: \>=50% reduction in serum M-protein \& reduction in 24h urinary M-protein by \>=90% or \<200 mg/24h. Analysis was performed using IPTW method to balance participant characteristics among reporting groups.
次要结局
- Time to Response (TTR)-Unweighted Analysis(From index date to date of first documentation of OR (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts))
- Time to Response (TTR)-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and COTA Cohort Using IPTW Analysis(From index date to date of first documentation of OR (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts))
- Time to Response-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and Flatiron Health Cohort Using IPTW Analysis(From index date to date of first documentation of OR (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts))
- Duration of Response (DOR)-Unweighted Analysis(From first documentation of OR until confirmed PD or death due to any cause or censoring date (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts))
- Duration of Response-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and COTA Cohort Using IPTW Analysis(From first documentation of OR until confirmed PD or death due to any cause or censoring date (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts))
- Duration of Response-Comparison Between Elranatamab in Study C1071003 Cohort A and Flatiron Health Cohort Using IPTW Analysis(From first documentation of OR until confirmed PD or death due to any cause or censoring date (median follow-up of 10.4 months for study C1071003 cohort A, 8.8 months and 7.7 months for COTA and Flatiron Health cohorts))