Understanding Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Within Different Physical Activity Profiles: Comparing Athletes and Sedentary Individuals
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 663
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study is to compare artificial intelligence anxiety (AIA) in athletes and sedentary individuals, evaluate its relationship with exercise frequency, and identify the subdimensions that cause high anxiety at the level of AIA scale items.
详细描述
The study will include healthy individuals aged between 18 and 45 years who either engage in regular exercise or lead a sedentary lifestyle. Participants with regular exercise or sports habits and those who are sedentary will be compared in terms of their anxiety levels toward artificial intelligence. Prior to assessment, written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Additionally, demographic and health-related data will be collected, including age, sex, weight, height, presence of chronic diseases, medication use, history of surgical operations, frequency of daily activities, pain status, and alcohol or tobacco use. Data collection will be conducted using the Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 45 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Being between 18 and 45 years of age
- •Having engaged in regular exercise or sports at least twice a week over the past six months (for athlete group)
- •Not having engaged in regular exercise during the past six months (for sedentary group)
- •Being exposed to basic concepts of artificial intelligence (via media, news, education, etc.)
- •Having sufficient cognitive ability to complete the questionnaires
排除标准
- •Having a chronic neurological, orthopedic, cardiovascular, psychological, or similar medical condition
- •Having a serious physical disability that prevents participation in exercise
- •Incomplete or inconsistent responses in the questionnaires
- •Having undergone a recent surgical operation
- •Lack of voluntary consent to participate in the study
研究组 & 干预措施
Sedentary individuals
Sedentary individuals who have not engaged in regular exercise within the past six months, who have been exposed to basic concepts of artificial intelligence (through media, news, education, etc.), who possess sufficient cognitive ability to complete the questionnaires, and who do not have any chronic neurological, orthopedic, cardiovascular, or psychological conditions.
干预措施: Questionnaire and Physical Exam (Other)
Athletes
Licensed athletes who have engaged in regular exercise or sports at least twice a week during the past six months, who have been exposed to basic concepts of artificial intelligence (through media, news, education, etc.), who possess sufficient cognitive capacity to complete the questionnaires, and who do not have any chronic neurological, orthopedic, cardiovascular, or psychological conditions.
干预措施: Questionnaire and Physical Exam (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale
时间窗: baseline
The Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale (AIAS) is an assessment tool that asks each participant to reflect on their current experiences. It is a 7-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 7 (completely). The scale consists of four subdimensions: learning, job replacement, socio-technical blindness, and AI configuration. The total score ranges from a minimum of 21 to a maximum of 147. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety experienced in relation to artificial intelligence.
The Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale
时间窗: baseline
The Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale (EBBS) is designed to assess individuals' attitudes toward exercise, specifically their perceived benefits and barriers. It is intended for use with individuals aged 18 years and older. The scale uses a 4-point Likert format: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = agree, and 4 = strongly agree. It consists of 43 items in total and includes two main components: the Exercise Benefits Scale and the Exercise Barriers Scale. These components can be used independently or evaluated together using a total score.In the Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale (EBBS), higher scores on the Benefits Scale indicate more positive attitudes and stronger beliefs about the advantages of exercise. Conversely, higher scores on the Barriers Scale reflect greater perceived obstacles to engaging in exercise. When a total score is calculated (with barrier items reverse-coded), higher total scores represent a more favorable overall attitude toward exercise.
次要结局
未报告次要终点