跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02668029
NCT02668029已完成2 期

Effect of Ambulatory Oxygen on the Walking Test in Patients With Pulmonary Fibrosis Normoxemic at Rest Who Desaturate on Exercise

University of Siena0 个研究点目标入组 32 人开始时间: 2012年4月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
32
主要终点
distance walked

研究概览

简要总结

Patients with pulmonary fibrosis often desaturate on exercise. There are no data showing whether ambulatory oxygen can be useful to improve exercise capacity in this condition. Ambulatory ambulatory oxygen is often denied to these patients based on studies conducted on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a completely different condition for physiopathology, prognosis, and response to therapy. We therefore planned a controlled study to verify the usefulness of ambulatory oxygen in patients with pulmonary fibrosis

详细描述

Criteria for inclusion: Patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis of any kind, with oxygen saturation >90% in ambient air at rest, showing a desaturation <88% during a preliminary 6 minutes walking test Criteria for exclusion: Inability to give consent, age <18 or >85 years, walking problems from causes different from pulmonary disease

Procedure:

In a preliminary session, the flow of oxygen needed to prevent desaturation during walking is established according to a validated protocol Guyatt et al, Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001,163:,942-946.) Two 6 minutes walking tests are then performed in a corridor, at least 30' apart, during administration of oxygen or medical air, in random order and double blind, at the same pre-determined flow, administered through a nasal cannula connected to a wall outlet (concealed from sight, being in a side rum at about mid distance in the corridor) through a 10 mt plastic tubing. Oxygen saturation and pulse rate are monitored through a dedicated recording oximeter (Minoxy, Cosmed) , whose display is concealed to both the patient and the operator, with an alarm set for oxygen saturation <70%, to stop the test in case severe desaturation would occur Data are then transferred to computer for analysis only after both test are performed. Walked distance is recorded by the operator unaware of treatment.

At the end of each test, a short questionnaire is administered with 10 cm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) for dyspnoea, fatigue, and preference compared to performing the test without any treatment. At the end of the second test a further scale is submitted, asking about the preference between the two treatments.

Primary outcomes are the distance walked and the difference in preference of the two treatments compared o no treatment. Secondary outcomes are differences in minimal saturation level and maximal pulse rate during the test and in the report of dyspnea and fatigue at the end of the test, and the reported preference between the two treatments.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Pulmonary fibrosis of any cause
  • Oxygen saturation => 90% at rest in ambient air, and <88% during walking test

排除标准

  • Inability to give consent
  • Walking impaired by any condition except pulmonary disease

研究组 & 干预措施

oxygen

Experimental

oxygen administered through a nasal cannula at a personalized, fixed flow

干预措施: oxygen (Drug)

medical air

Placebo Comparator

Medical air administered through a nasal cannula at the same flow

干预措施: medical air (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

distance walked

时间窗: end of test (6 minutes)

recorded by operator

Difference in preference of the two treatments compared to no treatment.

时间窗: end of test (6 minutes)

VAS scale

次要结局

  • Difference in fatigue at the end of test(End of test (6 min))
  • Preference between the two treatments(End of both tests (45 min))
  • Difference in dyspnea at the end of test(End of test (6 min))
  • Difference in oxygen saturation level(Walking test (6 min))
  • Difference in heart rate(Walking test (6 min))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Piersante Sestini

associate professor

University of Siena

相似试验