Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 500
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Modified Rankin Scale
研究概览
简要总结
With evolving endovascular technologies there is a growing debate centered on the relative safety and efficacy of the currently accepted alternatives for the treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in the face of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling of acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms in a prospective, randomized fashion.
详细描述
The planned trial enrolled 250 subjects per arm. Subjects are followed postoperatively and outcome endpoints will be assessed at Discharge, 6 Months, 1 Year, 3 Years, and 6 Years. One hundred (100) subjects will participate in neuropsychological testing at 1 Year; after the 100th subject an interim data analysis will be performed and the viability of future neuropsychological testing will be determined. Subjects will receive preoperative, intraoperative or postoperative, 3 Year follow up, and 6 Year follow up angiograms. In this fashion immediate clinical outcome, including peri-procedural morbidity and mortality, will be assessed as will long term outcome, both clinical and angiographic.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 80 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)
- •Confirmed by CT scan or lumbar puncture
- •Age 18-80 years
- •Ability to give informed consent (subject or legally authorized representative)
- •No anatomic inclusions
排除标准
- •Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage
- •Presents to hospital >14 days post-bleed
- •SAH caused by other primary disease
- •No anatomic exclusions
结局指标
主要结局
Modified Rankin Scale
时间窗: 10 years
Primary Outcome Measure is Modified Rankin Scale \< or = to 2. Data will be analyzed on intent to treat basis with crossover to the alternative treatment analyzed as a data subset. The null hypothesis is that no difference in outcome will be detected between the endovascular and surgical treatment arms. A statistically significant difference will then be considered evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis, that one treatment is superior to the other.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Lisa Arnold
Research Operations Manager
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix