Histological Comparison of Healing Following Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Cortical Versus Cancellous Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 40
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to compare cortical and cancellous freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) materials in the preservation of alveolar bone following extraction of non-molar teeth. The primary objective is to histologically evaluate and compare the healing of extraction sockets of non-molar teeth grafted with cortical FDBA versus cancellous FDBA for ridge preservation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 19 Years 至 99 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •single rooted tooth requiring extraction with future dental implant placement
排除标准
- •smoking > 10 cigarettes per day poorly controlled diabetes
研究组 & 干预措施
cancellous FDBA (LifeNet)
grafting with cancellous mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (LifeNet Health)
干预措施: Cancellous FDBA (Device)
cortical FDBA (LifeNet)
CORTICAL FREEZE-DRIED BONE ALLOGRAFT (from LifeNet Health)
干预措施: cortical FDBA (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation
时间窗: 18-20 weeks after grafting
Histologic percentage of vital bone formation in bone cores
次要结局
未报告次要终点
