跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/11/096762
CTRI/2025/11/096762尚未招募不适用

Comparison of intracycle Extended Letrozole Regimen and Gonadotropins for Letrozole-Resistant Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Ovulation Induction-A randomized controlled pilot study

KIMS Foundation and Research Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2025年11月15日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrinopathy affecting women of reproductive age. The prevalence ranges from 6 to 21 percent in the global population, depending on phenotype and ethnicity. In 2018, new evidence-based international consensus guidelines for women with PCOS highlighted the use of letrozole (LE) as the first-line treatment for OI to improve pregnancy rates while reducing adverse effects and gonadotropins as the second line of treatment.

Traditional LE treatment protocol involves administering a daily dosage of 2.5 mg or 5 mg for 5 days. However, follicular development varies among patients, with 20–30 percent of women failing to ovulate despite traditional letrozole therapy. According to current guidelines, gonadotrophins and laparoscopic ovarian drilling are recommended as second-line treatment options. Alternative strategies include extending the duration of letrozole therapy in subsequent cycles.  Recent studies show that extending the duration of LE treatment in patients with PCOS, who have not ovulated with the standard 5-day LE regimen, can enhance follicular development and achieve ovulation. In a randomized controlled trial, the extended letrozole regimen (5 mg for 7 days) resulted in a significantly higher ovulation rate of 78–82 percent**,** compared to 60–65 percent in the conventional regimen (5 mg for 5 days). A retrospective study further supported these findings, showing improved ovulation rates and endometrial thickness in patients who received extended or individualized letrozole dosing (5 mg for 10 days), especially among those resistant to standard treatment. These findings collectively suggest that an extended letrozole protocol may be more effective in enhancing ovulation outcomes in women with PCOS.

Another alternative for ovulation induction is the use of gonadotropins; however, this approach is more expensive, requires intensive monitoring, and carries an increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation and multiple pregnancies. In our population, where cost-effectiveness and accessibility to fertility treatment are crucial, particularly for women residing in remote areas with limited access to regular clinic visits, treatment protocols must be optimized accordingly.

Our analysis of ovulation induction data and letrozole response revealed that among patients resistant to standard letrozole therapy, 83 percent responded favorably to an extended letrozole regimen within the same cycle. In women who fail to develop a greater than 10 mm follicle by day 10 of the stimulation cycle, extending ovarian stimulation rather than abandoning the cycle may improve outcomes.

Therefore, we propose a randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of an extended letrozole regimen with that of a gonadotropin protocol in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who exhibit inadequate response to first-line letrozole therapy (5 mg for 5 days) during ovulation induction

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
21.00 Year(s) 至 40.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
Female

入选标准

  • • Women aged between 21 to 40 years with Body Mass Index (BMI) ranging from 19 to 35 kg/m².
  • • Treatment naïve patients • Women who underwent ovulation induction elsewhere Letrozole resistance is defined as the lack of follicular development beyond 10mm on the day 10 ultrasound scan among patients who underwent standard LE therapy 5 mg for 5 days.
  • These patients will be randomised after the day 9 scan to either extended letrozole or gonadotrophins for follicular development.

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究者

发起方
KIMS Foundation and Research Center
申办方类型
Research institution
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Vyjayanthi Srinivasan

Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验