Expert Consensus Statements for the Management of Sepsis in Resource Limited Settings Using a Delphi Method
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 36
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Questionnaire statements which have reached pre-defined consensus
研究概览
简要总结
Rapid evolution of sepsis syndromes means that timely diagnosis and treatment are critical in improving outcomes but this may be difficult to achieve in many low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) and there is a lack of high quality clinical evidence to guide diagnosis and management in LMIC settings. The wide variability in health systems in LMICs means that additional areas of guidance may be required where staff or facilities are lacking. In the absence of clinical data, to address some of these issues, the investigators aim to use Delphi methodology to obtain experts consensus statements on some specific aspects of sepsis management in LMICs.
详细描述
The investigators aim to use a Delphi process to generate expert consensus practice statements in the context of diagnosis and management of sepsis in LMICs, including identification of aspects of sepsis diagnosis and management in LMICs not covered by existing guidelines. The questions will undergo several iterative rounds and will be in multiple-choice or Likert scale format. A study steering group will review the results of each round via video conference and design the questionnaire for the next survey. Summary results of each round will be presented to experts, along with the survey questionnaire for the next round. The survey process will be repeated with the modified questionnaire. The Delphi rounds will continue until the desired consensus and stability are achieved.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Other
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Recognized experts meeting pre-defined criteria (below) from a wide geographical distribution with approximately 70% from LMICs.
- •Clinical expertise in adult sepsis management, AND
- •Demonstrated involvement with sepsis related research, educations, policy/protocols, professional activities
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Questionnaire statements which have reached pre-defined consensus
时间窗: 2 weeks
Descriptive analysis of questionnaire statements which have reached pre-defined consensus. Consensus will be defined as \>70% participants in favour of agree/disagree statements (Likert scale 1-3 means disagree or 5-7 means agree), or \>80% in favour of single option in a single stem question with multiple responses (yes/no answers).
次要结局
未报告次要终点